Teams

Carrollwood 40 Love - L. Gregory

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-22vs Hills/T. Hartigan/40&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathi Wise / Lacy Gregory vs Elizabeth Provenzano / Lisa Dreisbach3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Wingard / Gina Lund vs Carole Jahns / Amy Quinn6-7, 4-6
2023-05-15vs HCC Smoke Show - E. FlitmanWon 20
W#2 DoublesLacy Gregory / Kathi Wise vs Emelia Flitman / Evelyn Delelys6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Wingard / Gina Lund vs DIANA POSADA / Marisol Cohen6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKaren Wingard / Kathi Wise vs Pamela Gonzalez / Jolanta Lagowski6-1, 0-2
2023-05-01vs Cheval - B. BurdetteLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Wingard / Valerie Carrillo vs Vera Trayner / Anjali Singh2-6, 4-6
2023-04-24vs Yachty By Nature - L. DavittWon 20
W#2 DoublesValerie Carrillo / Karen Wingard vs Margaret Mariani / Haley Miller6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathi Wise / Raquel Pullaro vs Monica la Puente / Julianne Frost1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKaren Wingard / Johnessa Hern vs Carol Guidera / Karen Cleland6-3, 7-5
2023-04-10vs AvilaWon 10
W#2 DoublesGina Lund / Kathi Wise vs Michelle Fitz-Randolph / Laura Southwell6-2, 6-3
2023-04-03vs Van Dyke Farms - M. HestonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGina Lund / Karen Wingard vs Wendy Corn / Audrey Kessler2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRaquel Pullaro / Kathi Wise vs Cherie Adkins / Helen Reynolds6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Catalina Biolcati
published 3.5
3.27
Karen Wingard
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Lacy Gregory
published
2.98
2.88
Gina Lund
published
2.72
Jackie Botet
published
2.69
Kathi Wise
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Raquel Pullaro
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Suzanne Huffman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Wingard + Kathi Wise4349% gamesnot enough data
Raquel Pullaro + Kathi Wise213 matchesnot enough data
Lacy Gregory + Karen Wingard213 matchesnot enough data
Lacy Gregory + Catalina Biolcati213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catalina Biolcati
101W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
3.73
3.5
Karen Wingard
117W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Lacy Gregory
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.26
3
Karen Wilhelm-Mace
32W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Gina Lund
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
Jackie Botet
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%6%94%
2.72
3
Kathi Wise
31W–20L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Raquel Pullaro
72W–68L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Suzanne Huffman
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.