Teams

Country Village - Old School

*2026 Houston Fall League (2025) NA - Thursday Men's Doubles · Open Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-13vs LLTC - Spice PandasWon 21
W#1 DoublesTravis Smith / Neil Carpenter vs Thomas Nguyen / Clement Vo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Ashley / Phi Huynh vs Richard Nguyen / Ruben Vargas7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAllen Teague / Adrian Melchor vs Hung Choe / Peter Nguyen6-7, 2-6
2025-10-30vs Lifetime GalleriaLost 03
L#1 DoublesBjoern Steckel / Phi Huynh vs Dimitri Ang / Archibald Gwathmey Jr4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesF Blum / Adrian Melchor vs Stoney LeBlanc / Kevin Ting0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Jordan / Allen Teague vs Nathan Mortel / Ramiro Trevizo1-6, 0-6
2025-10-16vs LLTC - OpenLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Cooper / Neil Carpenter vs Ross Gehlhausen / Michael Smith2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPhi Huynh / Jeffrey Jordan vs Jose Antelo / Fernando Arguello2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBjoern Steckel / Adrian Melchor vs Jarod Jahns / Matthew Geisel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-09vs LLTC - Spice PandasWon 21
L#1 DoublesNeil Carpenter / Phi Huynh vs Thomas Nguyen / Ruben Vargas3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTravis Smith / Mark Ashley vs Sean Lam / Hung Choe6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLuis Cobo / Jeffrey Jordan vs Christopher Bui / Huy Nguyen6-3, 6-4
2025-10-02vs Cinco Ranch West - SlammersLost 12
L#1 DoublesNeil Carpenter / Jay Shroff vs Leland Rolling / Albert Piasecki1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPhi Huynh / Adrian Melchor vs Adam Ewing / Steven Griffith3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMark Ashley / Kris Jacobs vs Monty Lindloff / Igor Milisavljevic6-4, 6-4
2025-09-25vs Lifetime GalleriaLost 04
L#1 DoublesNeil Carpenter / Phi Huynh vs Christopher Sioco / Mihir Nadig1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Castellano / Michael Drake vs Archibald Gwathmey Jr / Jimmy Zhang0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Ashley / Michael Wasik vs Cameron Klement / Nathan Mortel1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesF Blum / Luis Cobo vs Stoney LeBlanc / Javier Artola2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Open Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Bjoern Steckel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Travis Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Luis Cobo
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Jeffrey Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.16
Phi Huynh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
F Blum
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
4.06
Neil Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Adrian Melchor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Allen Teague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Michael Wasik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Hennessey
published
Jay Shroff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Castellano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kris Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Ashley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Drake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Cooper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Travis Smith + Ryan Cooper4254% games+1.1% vs expected
Allen Teague + Jeffrey Jordan7262% gamesnot enough data
Mark Ashley + Allen Teague4171% gamesnot enough data
Mark Ashley + Jeffrey Jordan134 matchesnot enough data
Neil Carpenter + Allen Teague224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Ashley + F Blum033 matchesnot enough data
Neil Carpenter + Jeffrey Jordan213 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Jordan + Luis Cobo303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bjoern Steckel
19W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.29
Travis Smith
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
Luis Cobo
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.24
Jeffrey Jordan
33W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
Phi Huynh
27W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
F Blum
6W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
Neil Carpenter
20W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.06
4
Adrian Melchor
11W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Allen Teague
40W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Michael Wasik
34W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Jason Hennessey
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jay Shroff
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Castellano
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kris Jacobs
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Mark Ashley
23W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Drake
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Cooper
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.