Teams

CMondshane (Lifetime)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-10vs AReynolds (CSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Dailly / Jennifer Boyd vs Renee Foster / Tracy Spiva4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-08vs TMacuga/JGraham (Park Crossing)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCory Mondshane / Toni Escuder vs Kathryn Ford / Torey Parsons6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesApril Minish / Julie Dailly vs Molly Brown / Tatiana Thomas1-6, 1-6
2022-04-01vs SPurdy (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Dailly / Lisa Darfler vs Carrie Carickhoff / Melissa Kreager1-6, 1-6
2022-03-29vs DShealy/TRand (Firethorne)Won 10
W#1 DoublesToni Escuder / Debra Holland vs TARA RAND / Jennifer Voci6-4, 6-4
2022-03-25vs KLoor/ACheek (Park Road)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesToni Escuder / Debra Holland vs Bernice Cutler / Karie Greathouse4-6, 3-6
2022-03-18vs VWade (Springfield)Won 10
W#3 DoublesApril Minish / Julie Dailly vs Volree Wade / Julie Swanson6-3, 6-2
2022-03-04vs BTobia (Brookhaven)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Dailly / Leigh Clinard vs Giulia Lanni / Marla Ghitas6-2, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Toni Escuder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Lesly Carlton
published
2.86
Debbie Alexander
published 3
2.76
Julie Dailly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Patti Glassner
published
2.60
2.58
Debra Holland
published 3
2.27
Lisa Darfler
published
April Minish
published
Cory Mondshane
published
Karen Moran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Alexander + Julie Dailly123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Toni Escuder
66W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34
Lesly Carlton
12W–13L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Debbie Alexander
20W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Julie Dailly
47W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Patti Glassner
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Viviane Bechtler-Smith
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Debra Holland
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Lisa Darfler
5W–17L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
April Minish
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Cory Mondshane
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Moran
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.