Teams

Sets Pistols

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.91 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-27vs Early RisersLost 03
L#1 SinglesDan Wold vs Eric Walters6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChad Trued vs Bryan Escobedo1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTravis Hopkey / Chase Hoffman vs Scott Bessey / Cory Mecham0-6, 4-6
2023-06-19vs OverratedWon 21
W#2 DoublesLeon Samuels / Jeffrey Raulston vs Alex Kuzmenko / Russell Lewis6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDan Wold vs Noe Lopez3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBen Meibergen / Travis Hopkey vs Indranil Roy / Steve Gray6-3, 6-2
2023-06-14vs Shank'd It 18sWon 21
W#1 DoublesAustin Wilkes / Jeffrey Raulston vs John Rice / Jason Jones7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBen Meibergen / Travis Hopkey vs Roy Atkinson / Jason Steele6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesChad Trued vs Joshua Cramer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-12vs Miller TimeWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Raulston / Travis Hopkey vs William Goslovich / Michael Markley6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDan Wold vs Miles Brown6-2, 6-0
2023-06-05vs CHAK DE BOISE STARSSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBen Meibergen / Travis Hopkey vs Anil Kukutla / Rick Stoddard6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Raulston vs Shyam Anantharaman6-7, 2-6
2023-05-31vs MSA (Mas Serve Aces)Won 21
L#1 SinglesChad Trued vs Russell Sauer2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Raulston vs Andrew Wyckoff7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCasey Boren / Dan Wold vs Andy Emerson / Cody Perdue6-2, 7-5
2023-05-24vs Joint Chiefs of HashSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDan Wold vs Richard Ipock3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesChad Trued vs Enrique Camarillo6-2, 7-5
2023-05-22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDan Wold vs Trever Browne2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Austin Wilkes
published 4
3.96
Tayler Henrie
published 4
3.81
Alex Henrie
published 4
Chase Hoffman
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Dan Wold
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.71
Chad Trued
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.66
Jacob Wingerd
published 4
3.65
Leon Samuels
published 4
3.57
Bob Haycock
published 3.5
3.55
Ben Meibergen
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Casey Boren
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Jeffrey Raulston
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Travis Hopkey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Henrie + Austin Wilkes12261% games+2.0% vs expected
Chad Trued + Bob Haycock231455% games−1.6% vs expected
Casey Boren + Bob Haycock8648% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Raulston + Bob Haycock4950% gamesnot enough data
Travis Hopkey + Jeffrey Raulston6359% gamesnot enough data
Casey Boren + Dan Wold3642% gamesnot enough data
Dan Wold + Jeffrey Raulston6355% gamesnot enough data
Ben Meibergen + Travis Hopkey8061% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austin Wilkes
55W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Tayler Henrie
120W–68L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Alex Henrie
75W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Chase Hoffman
10W–6L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Dan Wold
22W–43L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Chad Trued
67W–77L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Jacob Wingerd
92W–71L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Leon Samuels
115W–92L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Bob Haycock
145W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
4
Ben Meibergen
104W–52L career · 12 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Casey Boren
84W–99L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey Raulston
52W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Travis Hopkey
95W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.