Teams

SD 4.0 Balboa TC/ Dang

2026 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- San Diego · SD Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings11 teams · SD Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC/ Hill000000
2SD 4.0 Tierrasanta TC/ Annobil000000
3SD 4.0 Coronado TC/ Hackworth000000
4SD 4.0 Balboa TC/ Dang000000
5SD 4.0 PBTC (1PM)/ Mauriz000000
6SD 4.0 Dragons @ Peninsula TC (TBD)/ Flores000000
7SD 4.0 UCRC String Breakers (1PM)/ Park000000
8SD 4.0 Peninsula TC (TBD)/ Haire000000
9SD 4.0 SDTRC/ Channick000000
10SD 4.0 Balboa TC/ Afifi000000
11SD 4.0 La Jolla TC (9:30)/ Ross000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Thomas Sullivan
published
4.14
Vinh Dang
published
3.98
Billy Arenas
published 4
3.98
Jacob Martin
published
3.91
Isaac Moore
published
3.85
Jeffrey Wolpert
published 4
3.84
Jeff Lin
published
3.83
Gregory Gerardo
published 4
3.83
James Strasser
published 4
3.83
Jed Galan
published 4
3.50
Ben LoBrutto
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vinh Dang + Jed Galan404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Sullivan
8W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
4.23
Vinh Dang
33W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
4.14
4
Billy Arenas
68W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.98
Jacob Martin
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%43%
3.98
Isaac Moore
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.91
4
Jeffrey Wolpert
24W–16L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Jeff Lin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Gregory Gerardo
41W–43L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
James Strasser
172W–78L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Jed Galan
160W–84L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Ben LoBrutto
12W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.