Teams

OC:Our Court:Bennett/West

2023 VT Tri-Level Men · 4.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-16vs EE:FeistWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvan Bennett / Ryan Matos vs Thomas Feist / Mark Stephenson7-5, 6-4
2023-11-15vs BTC:Called to Serve:KnickerbockerLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey West / Evan Bennett vs Jerry Knickerbocker / Andrew Murphy1-6, 4-6
2023-10-16vs BTC:Called to Serve:KnickerbockerLost 01
L#1 DoublesRyan Matos / Geoffrey West vs Jerry Knickerbocker / Andrew Murphy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-20vs EE:FeistWon 10
W#1 DoublesEvan Bennett / Geoffrey West vs Thomas Feist / Mark Stephenson6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTC:Called to Serve:Knickerbocker4040125
2OC:Our Court:Bennett/West2222436
3EE:Feist0404850

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Ryan Matos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Evan Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Geoffrey West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geoffrey West + Ryan Matos5751% games+10.9% vs expected
Evan Bennett + Geoffrey West1838% games+1.5% vs expected
Evan Bennett + Ryan Matos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Matos
25W–30L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.73
Evan Bennett
21W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Geoffrey West
11W–26L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.