Teams

LAWA-Wages/River Run

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 6.5 Women 40s

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-07vs LAPA-Pangilinan/Frye/NorthstoneLost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Penhall / Britney Bove vs Jennifer Nogowski / Katie Scruggs4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Natalie Brescian vs Heather Rheinbolt / Kristin Wilson4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesNatalie Brescian / Laura Wansley vs Sheila Hebert / Heidi Nyquist7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesColleen Penhall / Tara Hauk vs Amy Barnett / Mary Laliberte7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Wages / Kendrick Anderson vs Christine Cantello / Jan Wildman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Wages / Julie Lyerly vs Donna Strauss / Kristin Carvelli6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesERIN Wells / Laura Wansley vs Sheryl Theisen / Janet Nixon6-0, 6-2
2025-09-16vs LWMI-Mizicko/Holmes PeninsulaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBritney Bove / Colleen Penhall vs Lori Holmes / Ann Modlin2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Utz / Bridgette Ashbrook vs Suzun McCrary / Andrea Aunon4-6, 1-6
2025-09-09vs LSCH-Chast-Wulfhorst/WestportWon 30
W#1 DoublesKendrick Anderson / Laura Wansley vs Lorelei Hewitt / Catherine Wulfhorst6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTerri Utz / Cara Stanford vs Sheila Chast / Sylvia Holley6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrooke Harris / Natalie Brescian vs Sue Buse / Laura Gallapis6-4, 7-5
2025-09-02vs LMCO-Collins/WestportSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Wansley / Cara Stanford vs Mali Robinson / Shirley Pirkl5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeanne Farrell / Colleen Penhall vs Tanner Jordan / KJ Gibson6-2, 6-4
2025-08-26vs LDST-Stamey-Reimann/SCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeanne Farrell / Cara Stanford vs Lisa Bograd / Mindy Sells4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Lyerly / Tara Hauk vs Devon Stamey / Emily Spillman6-2, 6-2
2025-08-19vs LAPA-Pangilinan/Frye/NorthstoneWon 21
L#1 DoublesColleen Penhall / Terri Utz vs Jennifer Nogowski / Katie Scruggs2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Wages / Julie Lyerly vs Deborah Young / Victoria Ciucci4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesERIN Wells / Brooke Harris vs Jeannie Cassarino / Kristy Wiseman6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Britney Bove
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Kendrick Anderson
published
3.30
Julie Lyerly
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Colleen Penhall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.23
Laura Wansley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Leanne Farrell
published
3.09
Terri Utz
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.04
Natalie Brescian
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
ERIN Wells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Anne Wages
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Cara Stanford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Lauren Verlander
published
2.75
Tara Hauk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Penhall + Natalie Brescian7364% gamesnot enough data
Laura Wansley + Britney Bove314 matchesnot enough data
Cara Stanford + Terri Utz314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Lyerly + Britney Bove224 matchesnot enough data
Anne Wages + Natalie Brescian404 matchesnot enough data
Britney Bove + Colleen Penhall224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Wansley + Terri Utz123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Lyerly + Anne Wages303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Britney Bove
48W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Kendrick Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Julie Lyerly
82W–86L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Colleen Penhall
48W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.24
3.5
Laura Wansley
37W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Leanne Farrell
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Terri Utz
105W–92L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Natalie Brescian
57W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
ERIN Wells
47W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Anne Wages
45W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Cara Stanford
78W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Lauren Verlander
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
Tara Hauk
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Bridgette Ashbrook
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.