Teams

Slice Girls

Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women - Wed

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-12vs Alley Girls 2.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesRoberta Blazejewski / Helen Matthews vs Donna Mill / Michele Giacomucci4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJean Steinke / Nina Liou vs Mary Crowley / Suzanne Kane6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTong Li / Marian Inderelst vs Julie Smith / Pam Sorg7-5, 6-2
2026-08-12vs Simply SmashingWon 21
W#1 DoublesConstance Baranzano / Amy Sarne vs Annabella Wood / Christine Coburn6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiane Kidd / Nina Liou vs Linda Tighe / Pat Iffrig6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandra Chang / Elizabeth Nourian vs Kathy Treacy / Maureen Dowds3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-07-22vs One Love 55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesConstance Baranzano / Jean Steinke vs Stayci Avery / Dana Meltzer7-6, 1-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSherry Frank / Tong Li vs Nancy Matthews / Donna Marzullo6-4, 3-2
L#3 DoublesRoberta Blazejewski / Marian Inderelst vs Melissa Cohen / Amy Carhart3-6, 2-6
2026-07-15vs Summer Mid Court CrisisWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelen Matthews / Deb Zappacosta vs Hildy Bothwell / Joan Sullivan6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Nourian / Amy Sarne vs Angie Mancuso / Rong Nie6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJean Steinke / Marian Inderelst vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-08vs Alley Girls 2.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesDeb Zappacosta / Helen Matthews vs Lori Romano / Michele Giacomucci6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Chang / Roberta Blazejewski vs Julie Smith / Katie Grieco3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDiane Kidd / Nina Liou vs Susan Kelley / Tracy Vecchiolli6-0, 6-1
2026-06-24vs Simply SmashingWon 30
W#1 DoublesConstance Baranzano / Helen Matthews vs Joni Caimi / Ellyn Dratch6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Chang / Amy Sarne vs Catherine Ellis / Robin Wimberly4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherry Frank / Tong Li vs Pat Iffrig / Maureen Dowds6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women - Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Nina Liou
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Helen Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Constance Baranzano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Deb Zappacosta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Tong Li
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Jean Steinke
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Marian Inderelst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Roberta Blazejewski
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Elizabeth Nourian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Sherry Frank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Diane Kidd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Sandra Chang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Amy Sarne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Matthews + Deb Zappacosta8166% games+8.4% vs expected
Helen Matthews + Elizabeth Nourian18957% games+0.5% vs expected
Sherry Frank + Roberta Blazejewski4352% games−0.5% vs expected
Diane Kidd + Amy Sarne9951% games−0.8% vs expected
Sandra Chang + Marian Inderelst5456% games−2.2% vs expected
Constance Baranzano + Sherry Frank1538% games−5.4% vs expected
Roberta Blazejewski + Sandra Chang31045% games−10.4% vs expected
Jean Steinke + Amy Sarne5253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nina Liou
50W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Helen Matthews
119W–82L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Constance Baranzano
36W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Deb Zappacosta
12W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Tong Li
21W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Jean Steinke
69W–109L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Marian Inderelst
62W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Roberta Blazejewski
106W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Elizabeth Nourian
55W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Sherry Frank
67W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Diane Kidd
70W–106L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Sandra Chang
67W–86L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Amy Sarne
79W–84L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.