← Teams

NOR-SHC-Razon-Lumetta

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Michele O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.50
Amy Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Bill Rhoades
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Russ DeMoss
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Jason Hyde
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Paula Watt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Mark Beilstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Scott Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.09
Sam Lumetta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Gilbert Chiang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Michele O'Brien
101W–43L career
1%99%0%
3.75
3.5
Amy Murphy
48W–30L career
0%81%19%
3.50
4
Bill Rhoades
79W–87L career
38%62%0%
3.48
3.5
Nancy Korenek-Leveque
76W–80L career · type A
0%87%13%
3.47
3.5
Russ DeMoss
84W–42L career · type A
0%93%7%
3.43
3.5
Jason Hyde
53W–40L career
0%96%4%
3.37
3.5
Paula Watt
43W–47L career
13%84%3%
3.19
3.5
Mark Beilstein
56W–38L career
10%90%0%
3.11
3
Scott Mayer
70W–71L career · type A
0%51%49%
3.11
3.5
Sam Lumetta
33W–22L career
16%84%0%
3.09
3
Gilbert Chiang
46W–22L career
0%64%36%
3.07

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.