Teams

MC RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-28vs BP REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharlene Funk / Erin Gleason vs Brandy Echery / Audrey Pezzotti3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAshley Sakker vs Amy Daly3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Bush / Kay Newman vs Kelli E Barker / Kelli Sommer6-1, 7-6
2025-05-21vs RHCC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesSharlene Funk / Lexi Owens vs Kayla Neumann / Chrissy Costello6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAshley Sakker vs Amanda Vrbas6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Hank / Jillian Clark vs Jessica Geesaman / Annie Pearse6-3, 6-1
2025-05-14vs NJ REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesKay Newman / Elisabeth Bush vs Lindsay Thompson / Danielle Rupp2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLexi Owens vs Justine McWhorter1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Hank / Jillian Clark vs Leidy Boyce / Courtney Delfausse2-6, 6-7
2025-05-10vs MVCC BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesKay Newman / Elisabeth Bush vs Jessica Rowe / Nancy Fairchild4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLexi Owens vs Sasha Carlson6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJillian Clark / Sharlene Funk vs Heather Schram / Sarah Holst2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-30vs RHCC NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesKay Newman / Elisabeth Bush vs Kristin Magner / Natalia Huemoller4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Hank vs Andrea Hodapp6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErin Gleason / Ashley Sakker vs Nicole Stefanski / Liby Zachariah6-1, 6-3
2025-04-23vs LTC-D BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Sakker / Erin Gleason vs Karen Bent / Kim Hagar6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLexi Owens vs Paige Doherty6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKay Newman / Elisabeth Bush vs Meredith Greager / Tara Cronin6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2025-04-16vs NJ PURPLELost 02
L#1 DoublesSharlene Funk / Elisabeth Bush vs Alison Castel / Jennifer Burns6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJillian Clark / Amy Hank vs Rachel Harpster / Regina Stewart3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Hank
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.73
Lexi Owens
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.43
Ashley Sakker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.36
Sharlene Funk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.35
Kay Newman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.33
Jillian Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elisabeth Bush
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharlene Funk + Kay Newman7260% games+7.1% vs expected
Sharlene Funk + Amy Hank1443% games+4.3% vs expected
Jillian Clark + Amy Hank111248% games+1.0% vs expected
Kay Newman + Elisabeth Bush1444% games−2.1% vs expected
Sharlene Funk + Jillian Clark5446% games−5.1% vs expected
Sharlene Funk + Lexi Owens314 matchesnot enough data
Kay Newman + Jillian Clark134 matchesnot enough data
Lexi Owens + Kay Newman303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Hank
30W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lexi Owens
31W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Ashley Sakker
26W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
3
Sharlene Funk
69W–70L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.36
2.5
Kay Newman
73W–79L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.35
Jillian Clark
46W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Elisabeth Bush
12W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.