Teams

RANCHO COLORADOS 40AM3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-26vs DIAMOND HILLS 40AM3.5BLost 13
L#1 DoublesPrashant Desai / James Holder vs Conan Moats / David Palter7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBrian Feinberg vs Dennis Azevedo6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesScott Jorgensen / Michael Goldman vs William Burns / Steve Grimm0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJosh Norek / Andrew Holder vs Cesar Lozano / John Bahns1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-01-12vs DIAMOND HILLS 40AM3.5BWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Feinberg / Paul Hagopian vs Steve Grimm / Gerard Rose6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Holder / Gavin Neil vs John Bahns / Kelechi C Oji6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSamuel Radochonski / Joshua Schellenberg vs Alexander Macksoud / Jason Jefferson2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
James Holder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Gavin Neil
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Brian Feinberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Josh Norek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Eric Littell
published
3.17
Andrew Holder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Jerome Crochat
published
3.10
Borzoo Shadpour
published 3.5
2.87
Joshua Schellenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Scott Jorgensen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Hagopian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Samuel Radochonski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

James Holder
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Gavin Neil
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brian Feinberg
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Norek
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Eric Littell
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Andrew Holder
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Jerome Crochat
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Borzoo Shadpour
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Joshua Schellenberg
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Scott Jorgensen
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
Paul Hagopian
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Radochonski
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.