Teams

Fulkerson - Stoneleigh CC

2023 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-13vs Marple - River CreekSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarrie Henze / Patricia Yriart vs Carthina Marple / Sara Marlin0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaureen Fulkerson vs LoAnne Hanlon6-1, 6-2
2023-07-10vs Barnett/ Chestnut - CascadesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Haugh / Maureen Fulkerson vs Kristen Kilguss / Linda Chestnut7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPatricia Yriart vs Maryam Aranee6-3, 6-4
2023-07-07vs Marple - River CreekSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth McDonald / Christine Bartlett vs Marianne Moore / Joy Moynihan1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Haugh vs Carthina Marple3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-30vs Goodwin/ Bixler - AVSPWon 21
L#1 DoublesMelissa Haugh / Christine Bartlett vs Christy Bixler / Matina Roberts2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPatricia Yriart vs Amber Wooten6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaureen Fulkerson / Aimee McGranahan vs Tina Stroupe / Liliana Michaels6-0, 6-2
2023-06-19vs Barnett/ Chestnut - CascadesWon 10
W#1 SinglesMaureen Fulkerson vs Alexandra Robinson6-0, 6-1
2023-06-16vs Goodwin/ Bixler - AVSPWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatricia Yriart / Maureen Fulkerson vs Briona Desmond / Ashley Littman7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMelissa Haugh vs Matina Roberts6-2, 6-4
2023-06-12vs Blanketship - Creighton FarmsWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Bartlett vs Tamara Hurney3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Maureen Fulkerson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.95
2.81
Patricia Yriart
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.63
Melissa Haugh
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Aimee McGranahan
published 2.5
Heather Molloy
published 2.5
2.06
Christine Bartlett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maureen Fulkerson
63W–44L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
3
Elizabeth McDonald
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Patricia Yriart
29W–70L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Ashleigh Dickerson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Melissa Haugh
31W–67L career · 7 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Aimee McGranahan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Heather Molloy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Christine Bartlett
11W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.