Teams

SAN JOSE SR 40AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-08vs SUNNYVALE MTC 40AM4.0BLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Polhemus / Efrain Escalante vs Guangyu Xu / Shuchun Zhao6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Chamberlain / Craig Meyer vs Lu Li / Dongning Ma4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Adams / Larry Lem vs Jingping Wang / Michael Zhang3-6, 1-6
2025-01-28vs SUNNYVALE MTC 40AM4.0BSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBrett Anthony Foreman / Scott Polhemus vs Guangyu Xu / Shuchun Zhao6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJeevan Tambuluri vs Paul Xie5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Hahn / Thomas Hudson vs Jingping Wang / Michael Zhang6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDana Glusovich / Craig Meyer vs Dongning Ma / Shuguang Zhang7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
David Botkin
published 4
3.87
Brett Anthony Foreman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Garret Seevers
published
3.64
Efrain Escalante
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Scott Polhemus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Craig Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Dana Glusovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Anthony Hahn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Jeffrey Chamberlain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Pavel Konecny
published
Jeevan Tambuluri
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Larry Lem
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Botkin + Garret Seevers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Botkin
27W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Brett Anthony Foreman
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Garret Seevers
24W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.81
Efrain Escalante
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Scott Polhemus
8W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
4
Craig Meyer
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Dana Glusovich
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Anthony Hahn
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Jeffrey Chamberlain
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Pavel Konecny
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jeevan Tambuluri
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Larry Lem
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.