Teams

2 ACAC Neumann

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-09vs 3 ACAC Kellner/KrebsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanette Kim / Diane Linderman vs Elizabeth Coleman / Brittany Krebs3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-24vs 4 ACAC DavisLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Espasadin / Jeanette Kim vs Carol Pfeiffer / Erika King2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-06-11vs 1 Woodlake PoindexterWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanette Kim / Diane Linderman vs Stacey Cabral / Mary Estes6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-10vs 11 Salisbury Brunner-BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Linderman / Jeanette Kim vs Stephanie Voth / Julie Kearfott4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Robin Griffith
published
3.29
Diane Linderman
published 3.5
Jeanette Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Betsy Civilette
published 3.5
3.13
Kim Espasadin
published
3.10
Dawn MacHonis
published 3.5
3.05
Annmarie Strachan
published 3.5
2.90
Hilary Brodsky
published
2.81
Margaret Peters
published
2.66
Ann Yates
published 3
Donna Barrett
published
Jennifer Cubitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Barrett + Margaret Peters134 matchesnot enough data
Ann Yates + Margaret Peters314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Griffith
32W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Diane Linderman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Jeanette Kim
203W–155L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Civilette
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Kim Espasadin
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dawn MacHonis
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Annmarie Strachan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Hilary Brodsky
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
Margaret Peters
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Ann Yates
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
Donna Barrett
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Cubitt
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.