Teams

Farmington - 1

2023 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Women · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-06-05vs ACACWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Patti Pate vs Elizabeth Glover / Debbie Szalwinski6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Karin Jones6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-04vs BHSC - MooreLost 02
L#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Patti Pate vs Christina Beverage / Stephanie Radlick0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Hay Hardy vs Maggie Moore0-6, 1-6
2023-05-29vs Farmington - 2Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Gina Senese5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Sievers / Ann Hay Hardy vs Bliss Webel / Kate Gunter4-6, 3-6
2023-05-28vs Glenmore-EgidiWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Jeanette Wang vs Pam Socolow / Carrie Marquardt7-5, 6-2
2023-05-21vs Glenmore - 2Won 20
W#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Patti Pate vs Andrea Wilder / Christine Faulkner6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnn Hay Hardy vs Anna Minutella6-2, 6-0
2023-05-16vs BHSC - MooreWon 10
W#1 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Stephanie Radlick5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-14vs BH - HarrisWon 10
W#1 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Kathryn Harris6-4, 6-4
2023-05-08vs ACACLost 02
L#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Hobby Cole vs Elizabeth Glover / Wendi Cook4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAnn Hay Hardy vs Karin Jones2-6, 0-6
2023-05-01vs Glenmore-EgidiWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Hobby Cole vs Allison Egidi / Brooke Vergales6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Carrie Marquardt6-2, 6-3
2023-04-17vs Farmington - 2Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnn Hay Hardy / Kimberlee Barrett-Johnson vs Gina Senese / Scout Crimmins2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLoring Woodriff vs Lauretta Harbilas6-1, 6-1
2023-04-16vs Glenmore - 2Won 20
W#1 DoublesLoring Woodriff / Patti Pate vs Andrea Richardson / Andrea Wilder2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnn Hay Hardy vs Nerissa Rouzer6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Loring Woodriff
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Ann Hay Hardy
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.44
Courtney Sievers
published 3
2.40
Patti Pate
published
2.25
Jeanette Wang
published
1.95
Jennifer Keevil
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Hay Hardy + Loring Woodriff8654% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Loring Woodriff
71W–61L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Ann Hay Hardy
64W–53L career · 11 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Courtney Sievers
6W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Patti Pate
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.40
Jeanette Wang
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Jennifer Keevil
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.