Teams

Stordahl Kickin Aces

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 3.0 WOMEN

19 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-12vs Butwin: Lucillle 3Won 41
W#1 DoublesNadezda Semenova / Lisa Huang vs Molly Siering / Michelle Goldstein6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDunja Sher vs Mary Idzik6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Merriam / Teresa Litfin-Wertz vs Betsy Butwin / Rachel Baratz6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesDina VanderWaal vs Karee Lucchese6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAdena Borodkin / Mallory Monge vs Leigh Waterman / Kari Chester6-4, 6-2
2024-11-14vs Chase's Aces ES/FallWon 32
L#1 DoublesPaula Bach / Emma Goldberg vs Karen Kasner / Danielle Stewart5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Hank vs Mary McDermott6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdena Borodkin / Teresa Litfin-Wertz vs Alisa Chase / Mary Frances Price7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDunja Sher vs Mary Tham6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Brecht / Joan Weber vs Sarah Reinhart / Uyen Pham6-1, 6-1
2024-11-07vs Londer: OverservedLost 14
L#1 DoublesLisa Sheppard Pearson / Sandra Waryan vs Jenny Javitch / Jodi Lipschultz0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesPaula Bach vs Raleigh Miller2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Merriam / Ana Paula Zamorano vs Allison Perry / Amanda Getchell1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDina VanderWaal vs Rebecca Lieberman3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNadezda Semenova / Teresa Litfin-Wertz vs Lorie Korpi / Lauren Zaba6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Dunja Sher
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.08
Dina VanderWaal
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Nadezda Semenova
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Lisa Huang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Paula Bach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.95
Adena Borodkin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Monica Hoffmann
published
2.79
Teresa Litfin-Wertz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Lisa Sheppard Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Mallory Monge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Ana Paula Zamorano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Karen Ring
published
2.64
Emma Goldberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Beth Hank
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Laura Merriam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Kelly Stordahl
published
Joan Weber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Brecht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Waryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Huang + Ana Paula Zamorano4352% games−1.6% vs expected
Kelly Stordahl + Nadezda Semenova224 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Sheppard Pearson + Ana Paula Zamorano314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Merriam + Mallory Monge134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Sheppard Pearson + Nadezda Semenova303 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Huang + Nadezda Semenova213 matchesnot enough data
Laura Merriam + Teresa Litfin-Wertz213 matchesnot enough data
Mallory Monge + Teresa Litfin-Wertz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dunja Sher
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Dina VanderWaal
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Nadezda Semenova
19W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Lisa Huang
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Paula Bach
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Adena Borodkin
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Monica Hoffmann
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Teresa Litfin-Wertz
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lisa Sheppard Pearson
35W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Mallory Monge
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Ana Paula Zamorano
20W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Karen Ring
17W–24L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Emma Goldberg
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
2.5
Beth Hank
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Laura Merriam
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.37
Kelly Stordahl
10W–39L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.30
Joan Weber
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Brecht
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Waryan
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.