Teams

STC-Baker

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.39 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-07vs NTC-Team Swoop-GrahamWon 32
L#1 DoublesTheresa Maloney / Hanley Cahoon vs Kirsten Graham / Megan Hill1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCasey Pleas vs Andrea Petzel2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCameron Ferguson / Francesca Sheppard vs Cindy Jed / Pam MacDuff6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKate Bayley vs Khue Tran5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElla Odland / Elisabeth Odland vs Sarah Wilke / Elisabeth LINDLEY6-3, 6-1
2026-05-30vs BC-Happy Spicy-ParkSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCameron Ferguson / Francesca Sheppard vs Tricie Hunter / Dorothy Lowes6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJosie Barker vs Xinlu Tu0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Medzegian / Ella Odland vs Jingjing Cai / Miye Moriguchi6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulia Pascualy / Amy Friedland vs Erin Park / Bridget Haba6-7, 5-7
2026-05-17vs AYTC-RacqPack-ZakahiWon 32
W#1 DoublesKelly Medzegian / Cameron Ferguson vs Katie Jergens / Hien Nguyen6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAshley Wood vs Dina Kosiakova0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesOlivia Battison / Casey Pleas vs Elisabeth Frerichs / Tina Zakahi6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTatjana Mullally vs Jeannie Malanowski3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesElisabeth Odland / Ella Odland vs Pam Rasanen / Tram-Anh Pham0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-10vs RBW-Symphony#5-ChanLost 23
W#1 DoublesElisabeth Odland / Ella Odland vs Lisa C / Nicole Ballas2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesOlivia Battison vs Tracy Chen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 Doubleshailey mathers / Tatjana Mullally vs May-Jun Chao / Jessie Drakulich0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMadeline McReynolds vs Oxana Aelion0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Wood / Amy Friedland vs Kate Kennedy / Joanne Yu6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs TUK-Pro Penn Pals-TranSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTheresa Maloney / hailey mathers vs Alice Chang / Katie Ly6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Baker vs Kimberly Lum6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElla Odland / Elisabeth Odland vs Laura Tran / Pera Tran3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHanley Cahoon / Madeline McReynolds vs Eve Le / Hyemin Jeon3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-26vs CP-TNT-SikkaWon 32
W#1 DoublesCameron Ferguson / Francesca Sheppard vs Mallica Sikka / Mingming Zhan7-5, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCasey Pleas vs Miaomiao Zhang2-6, 0-6
W#2 Doubleshailey mathers / Olivia Battison vs Helen Wang / Sarika Calla6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesKate Bayley vs Jessica Zhi4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTatjana Mullally / Elisabeth Odland vs Tessa Chen / Christine Garnett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-18vs AYTC-Ballers-PollockLost 05
L#1 DoublesTheresa Maloney / Kelly Medzegian vs KC Mattingly-Nelson / Jamie Schroeder4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJosie Barker vs Rosie MacKinnon1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Baker / Casey Pleas vs Kim Nguyen / Christa Eadson6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Wood vs Rebecca Robbins1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElla Odland / Amy Friedland vs Mila Niset / Tetyana Sych1-6, 4-6
2026-04-12vs HBSQ-Net Results Will Vary-HoyLost 14
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Baker / Cameron Ferguson vs Elaine Hoy / Herwinda Tedjaatmadja4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCasey Pleas vs Shanti Thapa1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Medzegian / Hanley Cahoon vs Ali Jones / Rachel Wallach2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesOlivia Battison vs Hong Gu4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshley Wood / Josie Barker vs Susanna Hoke / Suong Phan0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesHanley Cahoon / Ella Odland vs Kim Carey / Jinhee Park6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Baker vs Mei Yang3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMadeline McReynolds / Kate Bayley vs Kimberly Caponigro / Tracy McCarron3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesOlivia Battison vs Colleen Tracy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulia Pascualy / Ashley Wood vs Julie McGoldrick / Mary Murray0-6, 0-6
2026-03-29vs BETC-LucenaWon 32
W#1 DoublesKelly Medzegian / Casey Pleas vs Ruth Yi / Wynstan Larsen6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Baker vs Olivia Carreon6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCameron Ferguson / Francesca Sheppard vs Chantal Tran / Jennifer Booth6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTatjana Mullally vs Katrina Lau3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElisabeth Odland / Ella Odland vs Andrea Escame-Hedger / Nadine Johnson Rice6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Francesca Sheppard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Cameron Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Elizabeth Baker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Ashley Wood
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.36
Theresa Maloney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Elisabeth Odland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.34
Olivia Battison
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Kelly Medzegian
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Casey Pleas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Hanley Cahoon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
hailey mathers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Kate Bayley
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
2.94
Ella Odland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Tatjana Mullally
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.89
Madeline McReynolds
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Amy Friedland
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Josie Barker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Julia Pascualy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elisabeth Odland + Ella Odland4152% games−0.2% vs expected
Kelly Medzegian + Hanley Cahoon0829% games−16.9% vs expected
Cameron Ferguson + Francesca Sheppard404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Francesca Sheppard
4W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Cameron Ferguson
5W–1L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Elizabeth Baker
11W–7L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Ashley Wood
1W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Theresa Maloney
5W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Elisabeth Odland
5W–1L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Olivia Battison
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
Kelly Medzegian
4W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Casey Pleas
7W–6L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Hanley Cahoon
1W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
hailey mathers
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kate Bayley
36W–17L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Ella Odland
12W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Tatjana Mullally
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Madeline McReynolds
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Amy Friedland
58W–43L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Josie Barker
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.75
Julia Pascualy
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.