Teams

Old Fashioneds

2026 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - Ventura · Ventura - Women 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-18vs Valle Lindo WarriorsLost 12
L#1 DoublesTamiko Deakin / Mary Nash vs Anne Renard / Jacqueline Francis2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Talmadge / Betsy Connell vs Carol Goldreyer / Debra Myrent5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatty Bolland / Riitta Andonian vs Annette Fasteau / Pamela Roach6-1, 6-1
2026-06-05vs Rancho ChicksWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Zins / Tamiko Deakin vs Kathryn Pisaro / Marilyn Moore6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatty Bolland / Riitta Andonian vs Renee Kieselbach / Tracy Tagliati6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Pollock / Janet Talmadge vs Shirley Gordon / Brenda Kyser6-2, 6-4
2026-05-29vs Valle Lindo WarriorsLost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Howey / Tamiko Deakin vs Jacqueline Francis / Louise Hewitt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCandy Edwards / Mary Nash vs Debra Myrent / Lucy Martin1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Pollock / Betsy Willey vs Janet Chandler / Mary Stone3-6, 1-6
2026-05-14vs Rancho ChicksLost 12
W#1 DoublesGina Howey / Maureen Finnigan vs Gizelda Parr / Renee Kieselbach2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatty Bolland / Susan Custance vs Tracy Collins / Brenda Kyser2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBetsy Willey / Mary Kay Daniels- Yu vs Shirley Gordon / Marty Fraser4-6, 2-6
2026-05-05vs Valle Lindo WarriorsLost 03
L#1 DoublesColleen Gulbranson / Theresa Yamamoto vs Cathy Welch / Jacqueline Francis0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Pollock / Janet Talmadge vs Anne Renard / Debra Myrent4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRiitta Andonian / Betsy Connell vs Mary Stone / Judith Cade4-6, 0-6
2026-04-23vs Rancho ChicksWon 30
W#1 DoublesGina Howey / Maureen Finnigan vs Robbie Knauer / Tracy Collins7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Custance / Lisa Zins vs Ellen Swagerty / Marty Fraser6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Yamamoto / Candy Edwards vs Gizelda Parr / Tracy Tagliati0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Ventura - Women 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Valle Lindo Warriors4211718145
2Rancho Chicks3371123163
3Old Fashioneds249923176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Maureen Finnigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Gina Howey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Lisa Zins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Colleen Gulbranson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Tamiko Deakin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Candy Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Patty Bolland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Carol Pollock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Mary Nash
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Janet Talmadge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Betsy Connell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.51
Susan Custance
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Betsy Willey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Riitta Andonian
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Mary Kay Daniels- Yu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Theresa Yamamoto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Riitta Andonian + Patty Bolland3444% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Finnigan + Gina Howey4156% gamesnot enough data
Carol Pollock + Janet Talmadge123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Talmadge + Mary Nash033 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Zins + Gina Howey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maureen Finnigan
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Lisa Zins
42W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Colleen Gulbranson
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tamiko Deakin
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Candy Edwards
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Patty Bolland
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Carol Pollock
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Janet Talmadge
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Betsy Connell
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Betsy Willey
1W–10L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
Riitta Andonian
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Mary Kay Daniels- Yu
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.33
Theresa Yamamoto
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.