Teams

JThompson/Knoxville/TN

2024 Adult 65 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Adult 65 & over Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-15vs TThompson/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJimmy Hyams / George Paynter vs T Thompson / Mike Canada5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJack Hatfield / Perry Beal vs Gary Irwin / David Jerden2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSon Duong / CHARLES IRVINE vs Doug Rieger / Richard Tillison6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-08vs TThompson/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJim Thompson / Bill Lenihan vs Gary Irwin / Mike Canada4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJimmy Hyams / George Paynter vs Doug Rieger / T Thompson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSon Duong / CHARLES IRVINE vs Kenny Archer / Richard Tillison4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-01vs TThompson/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesPerry Beal / Son Duong vs Doug Rieger / Ron Saver1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJimmy Hyams / George Paynter vs Kenny Archer / Richard Tillison6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRandal Dabbs / CHARLES IRVINE vs T Thompson / Gary Irwin6-3, 6-3
2024-05-11vs TThompson/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesCHARLES IRVINE / Son Duong vs Doug Rieger / Steve McGrew1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPerry Beal / Randal Dabbs vs Mike Canada / Gary Irwin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJimmy Hyams / George Paynter vs John Lovell / T Thompson4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Adult 65 & over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TThompson/Knoxville3210514125
2JThompson/Knoxville/TN1421327167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill Lenihan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
CHARLES IRVINE
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
George Paynter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jack Hatfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Son Duong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Jimmy Hyams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Perry Beal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Randal Dabbs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jimmy Hyams + George Paynter3446% games+5.0% vs expected
Son Duong + CHARLES IRVINE0537% games−5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Lenihan
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
CHARLES IRVINE
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
George Paynter
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Jack Hatfield
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Son Duong
6W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jimmy Hyams
7W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.08
Perry Beal
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Randal Dabbs
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.