Teams

Love Means Nothing

2026 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-24vs Smash SistersWon 30
W#1 DoublesTracie Munds / Heidi Hawkins vs Mary Adcox / Debbie Davies6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLynda Brown / Sabrina Stokes vs Jan Ingelstrom-Stewart / Jennifer Small6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStacie Hildebrandt / Linda Bloomer vs Leah Hart / Dawn Crochet2-6, 2-1
2026-06-22vs HCC Platinum PlusLost 02
L#2 DoublesTracie Munds / Angela Oddonetto vs Maureen Sykes / Kathy O'Neill4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesStacie Hildebrandt / Linda Bloomer vs Shawna Ianson / Alaina Sayers1-6, 2-6
2026-06-17vs Each Hit 55+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSabrina Stokes / Lynda Brown vs Jennifer Sukow / Zel Mertz2-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs Still SmashedLost 02
L#2 DoublesLynda Brown / Sabrina Stokes vs Carrie Fischer / Marie Parker5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoie Carlisle / Angela Oddonetto vs Sharon Mitchener / Suzanne Thomas1-6, 3-6
2026-06-10vs Midcourt CrisisLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoie Carlisle / Linda Bloomer vs Terri Mulcahy / Ellen Kennedy0-6, 1-6
2026-06-08vs Shady LadiesLost 02
L#2 DoublesStacie Hildebrandt / Lynda Brown vs Joanne Cornwell / Stacey Novak3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Oddonetto / Kathy Jennings vs Dawn Collias / Valencia Bilyeu0-6, 5-7
2026-06-03vs Nothing But Love 55+Won 21
W#1 DoublesTracie Munds / Joie Carlisle vs Lori Sato / Donna Moussalli2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynda Brown / Sabrina Stokes vs Lynn Clanton / Treva Pline7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Bloomer / Stacie Hildebrandt vs Kristin Young / Teresa Giamportone5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-27vs Smacks and SnacksLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracie Munds / Angela Oddonetto vs Bonnie Stotland / Ruth Fritz6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Heidi Hawkins
published 3.5
3.31
Leann Gilberg
published 3.5
3.22
Kristin Bailey
published 3.5
3.19
Angela Oddonetto
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Joie Carlisle
published 3.5
2.94
Kathy Hansen
published 3
2.94
Kathy Jennings
published 3
Linda Bloomer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lynda Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sabrina Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stacie Hildebrandt
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tracie Munds
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leann Gilberg + Heidi Hawkins8263% games+12.9% vs expected
Sabrina Stokes + Lynda Brown3547% gamesnot enough data
Tracie Munds + Joie Carlisle404 matchesnot enough data
Linda Bloomer + Stacie Hildebrandt213 matchesnot enough data
Tracie Munds + Stacie Hildebrandt213 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Jennings + Kristin Bailey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Heidi Hawkins
142W–130L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Leann Gilberg
124W–186L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Kristin Bailey
78W–86L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Angela Oddonetto
3W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Joie Carlisle
52W–47L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Kathy Hansen
65W–85L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Kathy Jennings
17W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Linda Bloomer
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynda Brown
24W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sabrina Stokes
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacie Hildebrandt
29W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracie Munds
20W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.