Teams

SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU2

2026 Adult Division - 65 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men SS 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 13 2:00 PM
Flint Canyon Tennis Club
Sep 20 11:00 AM
vs N/A
Michael Goran
Sep 27 2:00 PM
Flint Canyon Tennis Club
Oct 4 1:00 PM
Arcadia Tennis Center
Oct 11 11:00 AM
vs N/A
Michael Goran
L#1 DoublesRalph Ringgold / Yukishi Yamamoto vs Brian Newhall / Mustapha Baha1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesArthur Chmielewski / Moojan Khazra vs Charles Perry / Jack Horne3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesScott van Dellen / Eric Rodli vs Ken van Amringe / Daniel Takeyama1-6, 0-6
2026-08-16vs SGV Proud SGV-Chang-Arcadia/SU11Lost 03
L#1 DoublesYukishi Yamamoto / Ralph Ringgold vs Paul Moya / Jay Lee1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesArthur Chmielewski / Moojan Khazra vs Andy Chang / Leo Bautista0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Goran / Thomas Hegelund vs Bruce Burgher / Richard Roberts2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesArthur Chmielewski / Ralph Ringgold vs Daniel Takeyama / Jon Foran3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMoojan Khazra / Eric Rodli vs Ken van Amringe / Mustapha Baha0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Goran / Thomas Hegelund vs Robert Altman / Fernando Hernandez7-6, 0-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · SGV - Men SS 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SGV Proud SGV-Chang-Arcadia/SU111030011
2SGV Live Oaks Sexagenarians-Baha-Live Oaks/SU21021221
3SGV Nordic Thistles-Goran-Flint Cyn/SU202151066

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Yukishi Yamamoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Arthur Chmielewski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Thomas Hegelund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Rodli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Keith Berman
published
Michael Goran
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Moojan Khazra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ralph Ringgold
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roger Duncan
published
Scott van Dellen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Hegelund + Michael Goran3336% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yukishi Yamamoto
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
3.5
Arthur Chmielewski
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Thomas Hegelund
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Eric Rodli
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keith Berman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Goran
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Moojan Khazra
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ralph Ringgold
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roger Duncan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott van Dellen
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.