Teams

8-LOakley-CHCC

2023 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-04-25vs 6-DWebb-WWLost 01
L#2 DoublesKarol Wenner / Lee Wollman vs Barbara Howe / Beverly Fedewa1-6, 3-6
2023-03-31vs 1-CCleary-HRLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Vozella / Laurie Rechholtz vs Darlene Williams / Cindy Cleary3-6, 0-6
2023-03-28vs 9-MMacdonald-HS-55 /3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Rechholtz / Karen Sapir vs Mary Macdonald / Dori Liller5-7, 2-6
2023-03-14vs 3-JSykes-CCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesLee Wollman / Karen Sapir vs Debbie Michnowicz / Debra Stonehouse1-6, 1-6
2023-02-28vs 5-HKoo-UNCLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Hightower / Laurie Rechholtz vs Susan Bernstein / Bonnie Gould3-6, 3-6
2023-02-21vs 2-JOREGAN-HRWon 10
W#1 DoublesSara Morgan / Lee Wollman vs Kathleen Fitts / Marcey Setzer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Kathryn Chan
published
2.85
Laurie Rechholtz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Sara Morgan
published
2.65
Dorene Palermo
published
2.61
Laurie Oakley
published
2.55
Lee Wollman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Judi Seagroves
published
2.53
Karol Wenner
published
2.34
Julie Vozella
published
Karen Sapir
published
Lissa Jensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Vozella + Laurie Oakley3350% games+4.7% vs expected
Dorene Palermo + Judi Seagroves134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Chan
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Laurie Rechholtz
40W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Carolyn Hightower
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sara Morgan
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.70
Dorene Palermo
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
Laurie Oakley
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Lee Wollman
47W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55
Judi Seagroves
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karol Wenner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53
Julie Vozella
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
2.34
Karen Sapir
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lissa Jensen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.