Teams

SD 3.0WE Love All La Jolla TC/ Covello

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- San Diego · SD Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-14vs SD 3.0WE Peninsula TC/ BosworthLost 12
W#1 DoublesAileen Nemrow / Yumi Miyamoto vs Lorena Rojas / Emily Griffith6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Lundberg / Wendy Marchbanks vs Kayla Wiseman / Angela Wu1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Lopez / Demet Bucher vs Linden Conrad / Lu Gode2-6, 5-7
2025-12-13vs SD 3.0WE Peninsula TC/ HagstromLost 01
L#3 DoublesJill Ostrom / Angela Landen vs Jennifer Hagstrom / Janet Bergland4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Ostrom / Angela Landen vs Monica La Crue / Marisa Alvarado1-6, 0-6
2025-12-06vs SD 3.0WE Mtn View/ LimonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanne Cummings / Angela Landen vs Claudia Nelson / Aida Padilla6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJill Ostrom / Demet Bucher vs Anja Dixson / Caryn Rubanovich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Landen / Wen Liao vs Angela Christian / Marley Bennett3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJill Ostrom / Angela Landen vs Malinda Marsh / Whitney Johnson5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Aileen Nemrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.07
Jill Ostrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.93
Lulu Ren
published
2.77
Terri Lundberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Yumi Miyamoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Angela Landen
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Raquel Razon
published
2.66
Demet Bucher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Jeanne Cummings
published
Kelly Covello
published
Wen Liao
published
Wendy Marchbanks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Cummings + Kelly Covello7272% games+15.8% vs expected
Jill Ostrom + Angela Landen8452% games+2.2% vs expected
Yumi Miyamoto + Aileen Nemrow404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aileen Nemrow
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Jill Ostrom
27W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Lulu Ren
13W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Terri Lundberg
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Yumi Miyamoto
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Angela Landen
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Raquel Razon
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Demet Bucher
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Jeanne Cummings
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
Kelly Covello
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wen Liao
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wendy Marchbanks
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.