Teams

Shamoon-GGCC

2025 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-29vs Goldberg-GCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Davis / Jami Smith vs Rachel Goldberg / Swayze Hicks0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNancy Mason vs Sloane Fair0-6, 0-6
2025-04-01vs Walker-DCTRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatherine Shamoon / Mary Margaret Jones vs Kayla Walker / Ashley Brown1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesELIZABETH STALLWORTH vs Kelly McCorkle3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Mason / Jami Smith vs Schyler Cannatella / Chevy Davis2-6, 1-6
2025-03-25vs Brown-CCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatherine Shamoon / Nancy Mason vs Carley Brown / Shelby Carter1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesELIZABETH STALLWORTH vs Meredith Fletcher3-6, 4-6
2025-03-20vs Brown-CCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesELIZABETH STALLWORTH / Kim Rainwater vs Britney Rocconi / Amanda Roberts6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMary Margaret Jones vs Presley Roberson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Shamoon / Jami Smith vs Amy Martinez / Mallorey Campbell0-6, 0-6
2025-03-16vs Goldberg-GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Margaret Jones / Kim Rainwater vs Swayze Hicks / Beth Williams7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesELIZABETH STALLWORTH vs Lisa Smith7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Mason / Jami Smith vs Rachel Goldberg / Elizabeth Barnes0-6, 0-6
2025-03-06vs Walker-DCTRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Margaret Jones / Kim Rainwater vs Kayla Walker / Schyler Cannatella6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesELIZABETH STALLWORTH vs Kelly McCorkle1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJami Smith / Terri Murrell vs Chevy Davis / Ali Santucci0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.09 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.15
ELIZABETH STALLWORTH
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.03
Mary Margaret Jones
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Jami Smith
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Katherine Shamoon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kim Rainwater
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Mason
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Terri Murrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Margaret Jones + Kim Rainwater213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

ELIZABETH STALLWORTH
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Mary Margaret Jones
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Jami Smith
0W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Shamoon
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Rainwater
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Mason
0W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terri Murrell
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.