Teams

NOVA Aces

2023 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-13vs The WarriorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJumpei Nakamura / Yuji Ohno vs Muthukrishnan Ganesan / Ted Breinig6-2, 6-2
2023-06-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoong Min / Noah Rennert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlex Naja / Fa-Yueh Hung vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-20vs High VoltageWon 10
W#1 SinglesJumpei Nakamura vs Jin Hong6-3, 5-4
2023-05-17Won 20
W#1 DoublesYuji Ohno / Fa-Yueh Hung vs Mike Burgoyne / McLean Fonvielle6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJumpei Nakamura vs Justin Lee6-3, 3-3
2023-05-07vs Team CourtmastersWon 20
W#1 DoublesYuji Ohno / Fa-Yueh Hung vs Sanjivan Sivapiragasam / Elango Rengasamy6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJoong Min / Mark Matsko vs Christopher Jacob / Shawn Tith3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-10vs VN Racqueteers 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesFa-Yueh Hung / Matthew Christian vs Duy Nguyen-Khoa / Thuan Lai6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJumpei Nakamura vs Nhat Nguyen7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoong Min / David Todd vs Charles Phan / Eric Nguyen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Jumpei Nakamura
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.43
Fa-Yueh Hung
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Robert Kalfus
published
3.86
David Todd
published 4
3.77
Mark Matsko
published
3.68
Joong Min
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Ian Lucas
published
Matthew Christian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jumpei Nakamura + Fa-Yueh Hung7076% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jumpei Nakamura
84W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Fa-Yueh Hung
88W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
4.43
Robert Kalfus
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4
David Todd
58W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
Mark Matsko
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Joong Min
61W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Ian Lucas
26W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Matthew Christian
10W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.