Teams

Beerman TNT - T. Choe

2024 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-27vs LCC WidickLost 01
L#2 DoublesTiffany Love / Karola Cordero vs Linde Widick / Carol Mullins2-6, 1-6
2024-03-20vs CC of WH - B. MerrittWon 20
W#1 DoublesTiffany Love / Karola Cordero vs Elizabeth Merritt / Monica Trujillo4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Osborn / Kimberly Funk vs Jan Hyman / Sandy Ramsey6-1, 6-3
2024-02-21vs Polk/Spann/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesTiffany Choe / Kimberly Funk vs Jennifer Spann / Lauren Mason2-6, 3-6
2024-02-14vs LCC WidickSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCynthia Nettles / Karola Cordero vs Maya Beck / Kimberly Elmhorst2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTiffany Choe / Kimberly Funk vs Linde Widick / Susan Dreyer6-2, 6-4
2024-01-31vs City of Winter Haven - J. EdwardsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Mueller / Karola Cordero vs Heather Cain / Marquel Harrell6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Tiffany Choe
published
3.47
Tiffany Love
published
3.27
Kimberly Funk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Danielle Adkins
published 3.5
3.15
Leslie Simmons
published
3.11
Cynthia Nettles
published 3.5
3.07
Brandye Pickering
published 3.5
3.07
Gloria Murphy
published 3.5
3.06
Cindy Burgess
published 3.5
3.00
Karola Cordero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Simmons + Tiffany Love10461% games+9.7% vs expected
Cindy Burgess + Karola Cordero1449% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Choe
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
Tiffany Love
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kimberly Funk
106W–112L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Danielle Adkins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Simmons
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Cynthia Nettles
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Brandye Pickering
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Gloria Murphy
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cindy Burgess
4W–20L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
Karola Cordero
58W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.00
3
Catherine Mueller
26W–27L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.