Teams

5-EEverett-HVCC

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-29vs 1-MLong-Eno-40+ 3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Kelly Travis6-2, 6-4
2022-04-27vs 4-MIsrael-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Craver / Betsy Euler vs Jennifer Woods / Karen Sapir5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-11vs 3-LGilchrist-CHCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Kimberly Jeffs6-1, 6-1
2022-03-28vs 1-MLong-Eno-40+ 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesHadley Nixon / Lauren Powell vs Darcy Louzao / Heather Rigney6-1, 6-0
2022-03-21vs 2-LWollman-CHCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Stacey Lange6-2, 6-2
2022-03-14vs 3-LGilchrist-CHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesBetsy Euler / Elizabeth Everett vs Linda Gilchrist / Jessica Meadows6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHadley Nixon / Lauren Powell vs Kara Andrews / Kimberly Jeffs6-1, 6-1
2022-02-21vs 4-MIsrael-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBetsy Euler vs Sarah Sapeta1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHadley Nixon / Lauren Powell vs Beverly Buchman / Kathryn Chan6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Hadley Nixon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Betsy Euler
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.95
Joanie Preyer
published
2.88
Lauren Powell
published
Courtney Mumford
published 3
2.69
2.43
Susan Peak
published
Elizabeth Albright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Powell + Hadley Nixon2443% games−3.1% vs expected
Joanie Preyer + Hadley Nixon314 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Euler + Hadley Nixon044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hadley Nixon
77W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Betsy Euler
140W–108L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
Joanie Preyer
20W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lauren Powell
12W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Courtney Mumford
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Everett
13W–37L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Susan Peak
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43
Elizabeth Albright
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.