Teams

OCC Turner

2025 Lynchburg Tri-level · Lynchburg Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.44 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-27vs RC HooverLost 02
L#1 DoublesKellyn Trowse / Kathleen Spanos vs Lisa Hoover / Cecilia Robinson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJanissa Olson / Stephanie Cox vs Emmerson Colasanto / Amy Dietrich4-6, 2-6
2025-08-05vs RC HooverLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Rhem / Regan Kirk vs Anna Aldridge / Cecilia Robinson5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Blount / Kathleen Spanos vs Pascale Renald / Kendra Turner2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesFlor Midkiff / Diana Ferris vs Emmerson Colasanto / Amy Dietrich4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-28vs RC HooverLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Rhem / Erin Lake vs Anna Aldridge / Cecilia Robinson3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Lane / Elizabeth Kettinger vs Kendra Turner / Pascale Renald6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesFlor Midkiff / Sable White vs amy Shrock / Amy Dietrich3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amanda Rhem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Elizabeth Kettinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Kathleen Spanos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Regan Kirk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Margaret Blount
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Grace Jones
published 3.5
3.30
Rhonda Knight
published
Erin Lake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Elizabeth Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Carrie Turner
published 3.5
Diana Ferris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Janissa Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Sable White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Flor Midkiff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.39
Stephanie Cox
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kellyn Trowse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Roberts-Reid
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Flor Midkiff + Sable White224 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Knight + Kathleen Spanos033 matchesnot enough data
Carrie Turner + Regan Kirk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Rhem
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Kettinger
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Kathleen Spanos
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Regan Kirk
4W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
Margaret Blount
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Grace Jones
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
Rhonda Knight
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Erin Lake
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Lane
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carrie Turner
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Diana Ferris
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Janissa Olson
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Sable White
20W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
0%7%93%
2.69
3
Flor Midkiff
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Stephanie Cox
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%81%19%
2.39
Kellyn Trowse
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tina Roberts-Reid
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.