Teams

WRAC-Woodward

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-11-06vs SC-Middle SkittlesWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebra Miller / Brenda Dunn vs Janet Deandre / Lisa Dumais0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Lester / Laurie Luckman Adams vs Roberta Knorr / Donna Evans6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Linnell / Maureen Woodward vs Dawn Worrall / Mary Schafer6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-06vs CBRC-NewsomWon 21
L#1 DoublesGracie Helm / Debra Miller vs Joann Bunch / Sidney Newsom3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Luckman Adams / Ellen Lester vs Theresa Koehler / Mary Lipton6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMaureen Woodward / Brenda Dunn vs Monica Gehrke / Lory Allen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-11-05vs YTC-DonahueLost 12
L#1 DoublesGracie Helm / Debra Miller vs Michele Donahue / Cynthia Kimel4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaurie Luckman Adams / Ellen Lester vs Jody Snyder / Diana Welch1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaureen Woodward / Elizabeth Linnell vs Becky Melcher / Audrey James3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1YTC-Donahue2163773
2SC-Middle Skittles2163862
3CBRC-Cooley21541184
4WRAC-Woodward21541284
5IND-Tri-State Warriors WIM12451078

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Ellen Lester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Elizabeth Linnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debra Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gracie Helm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brenda Dunn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kelley Quinn
published
Laurie Luckman Adams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Woodward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen Woodward + Elizabeth Linnell3252% gamesnot enough data
Gracie Helm + Debra Miller044 matchesnot enough data
Ellen Lester + Laurie Luckman Adams303 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Dunn + Maureen Woodward213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ellen Lester
22W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Elizabeth Linnell
41W–43L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Debra Miller
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gracie Helm
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Brenda Dunn
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelley Quinn
64W–39L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Luckman Adams
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Woodward
34W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.