Teams

SD 4.0WE PennPros PTC/ Ogihara

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD- Women- WE 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.21 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-16vs SD 4.0WE Mtn View/ RuffoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBeth Timpe / Chloe Erikson vs Samantha Polikowski / Roanne Manzano-Roth6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGrace Ogihara / Claire Mittermiller vs Guadalupe Garcia / Brandy Baray6-7, 4-6
2024-06-09vs SD 4.0WE UCRC/ CarmichaelLost 02
L#1 DoublesChloe Erikson / Natalie DeForest vs Monika Wimmer / Val Zabaco2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Mittermiller / Grace Ogihara vs Laura Pettit / Dana Moskowitz2-6, 4-6
2024-06-02vs SD 4.0WE Balboa TC/ CrawfordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGrace Yao / Natalie DeForest vs Alex Brown / Kelly Jernigan6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChloe Erikson / Gina White vs Lisa Paler / Christina Khaokham6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-19vs SD 4.0WE SDTRC/ GinterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeth Timpe / Eve Sullivan vs Kerry Ott / Whitney Ginter2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesChloe Erikson / Natalie DeForest vs Natalie Whitmire / Gretchen Shaffer6-2, 7-5
2024-05-05vs SD 4.0WE Balboa TC/ CrawfordWon 10
W#1 DoublesNadine Utz / Beth Timpe vs Kelly Jernigan / Mikayla Vincent6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-28vs SD 4.0WE SDTRC/ GinterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesGrace Yao / Natalie DeForest vs Natalie Whitmire / Kerry Ott6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChloe Erikson / Grace Ogihara vs Avelina Kauffman / Soledad Ramirez3-6, 3-6
2024-04-14vs SD LLW 4.0WE Coronado TC/ WebsterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGrace Yao / Natalie DeForest vs Wanda Jurlina / Kellie McMullen6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEve Sullivan / Chloe Erikson vs Sarah Kimball / Jessica Cunningham4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-07vs SD 4.0WE Mtn View/ RuffoWon 20
W#1 DoublesGrace Yao / Beth Timpe vs Fabiola Flores / Sandra Lopez7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesClaire Mittermiller / Grace Ogihara vs Romiana Khoury / Roanne Manzano-Roth6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD- Women- WE 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Grace Yao
published
4.40
Nadine Utz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Arianna Michaels
published 4.5
4.06
Natalie DeForest
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.06
Claire Mittermiller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Chloe Erikson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Grace Ogihara
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.79
Beth Timpe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Eve Sullivan
published
3.61
Julia Carr
published
3.44
Gina White
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Mittermiller + Grace Ogihara15758% games+12.2% vs expected
Beth Timpe + Nadine Utz10163% games+5.4% vs expected
Beth Timpe + Chloe Erikson7354% games−11.2% vs expected
Natalie DeForest + Chloe Erikson6355% gamesnot enough data
Beth Timpe + Claire Mittermiller4260% gamesnot enough data
Chloe Erikson + Grace Ogihara224 matchesnot enough data
Natalie DeForest + Beth Timpe213 matchesnot enough data
Natalie DeForest + Nadine Utz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grace Yao
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.68
4.5
Nadine Utz
207W–51L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%75%24%
4.40
4.5
Arianna Michaels
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Natalie DeForest
57W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
4
Claire Mittermiller
81W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Chloe Erikson
45W–24L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Grace Ogihara
69W–48L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Beth Timpe
99W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Eve Sullivan
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Julia Carr
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Gina White
23W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.