Teams

GR Herremans SSL A18-3.5W

2024 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 3.5 W (7 player)

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-10vs PY Harris SSL A18-3.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesKimberly Johnson / Gayl Kessel vs Glorianna Fogarty / Francine Bruder0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSusana Doelder vs Lynda Rhodes6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelli Kovack / Laurie Herremans vs Donna Weber / Diane Dirette4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTricia Lyon / Tammy Graves vs Linda Scannell / Tonia Williams3-6, 5-7
2024-05-03vs PA Hendrickson SSL A18-3.5WSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusana Doelder / Jane Gillis vs Taylor Beusse / Elizabeth Terhorst2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJessica Zeilstra vs Cara Dykstra7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Herremans / Kelli Kovack vs Alison Gallagher / Megan Knuble3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hamm / Tricia Lyon vs Alissandra Kruer / Christine Martin6-0, 6-3
2024-03-08vs MVC Tsutsumi Buckhold SSL A18-3.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesKelli Kovack / Pauline Unfried vs Gretchen Asfour / Nancy Joure5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTrisha Bott vs Mary White2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusana Doelder / Jane Gillis vs Cindy Vander Ploeg / Natsuko Tsutsumi Buckhold7-5, 4-5
L#3 DoublesAnne Neis / Tammy Graves vs Michelle Madden / Amy Sjolin6-7, 2-6
2024-03-01vs PA Vinoski SSL A18-3.5WWon 31
L#1 DoublesTricia Lyon / Susana Doelder vs Kristin Hofman / Nicole Mick2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesPauline Unfried vs Samantha DeYoung6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJudy Siegel / Kimberly Johnson vs Ruth Kohley / Karen Sterzick6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGayl Kessel / Laurie Herremans vs Mary Burdo / Jennifer Koop6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 3.5 W (7 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jessica Zeilstra
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Julie Gardzinski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Gayl Kessel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Pauline Unfried
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Elizabeth Hamm
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kelli Kovack
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.16
Trisha Bott
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.15
Tracie Riebschleger
published
3.12
Judy Siegel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Tricia Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Susana Doelder
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Tammy Graves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Neis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Laurie Herremans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jane Gillis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susana Doelder + Tammy Graves6256% games+16.5% vs expected
Pauline Unfried + Tracie Riebschleger8064% games+10.5% vs expected
Gayl Kessel + Judy Siegel3255% games+6.2% vs expected
Kelli Kovack + Tracie Riebschleger5451% games+5.5% vs expected
Pauline Unfried + Kelli Kovack3350% games+3.3% vs expected
Pauline Unfried + Susana Doelder5748% games+1.5% vs expected
Judy Siegel + Kelli Kovack4846% games+0.8% vs expected
Pauline Unfried + Judy Siegel311854% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Zeilstra
24W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.54
Julie Gardzinski
104W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Gayl Kessel
129W–140L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.35
Pauline Unfried
241W–174L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Elizabeth Hamm
11W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kelli Kovack
41W–76L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Trisha Bott
16W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.16
Tracie Riebschleger
64W–60L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Judy Siegel
76W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Tricia Lyon
35W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Susana Doelder
98W–135L career · 5 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Tammy Graves
52W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Anne Neis
79W–44L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Herremans
20W–101L career · 3 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.72
Jane Gillis
52W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.