Teams

Davis Island ServeAces - T. Hartigan

2022 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesMegan Flanagan / Carole Jahns vs Christine Cruz / Julie Falanga7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Cowley / Elizabeth Provenzano vs Jana Alexander / Sibyl Curtis3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-14vs FH Sweetspots - C. DemingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTobey Hartigan / Katherine Cowley vs Monica Eiermann / Carol Guido3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Nero / Carole Jahns vs Natalya Burlakova / Kelly Powell6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTobey Hartigan / Mary Dunlap vs Olga Bonelli / Audrey Kessler7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarole Jahns / Elizabeth Provenzano vs Barbara Castro / MARY HESTON3-6, 4-6
2022-01-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarole Jahns / Elizabeth Provenzano vs Helen Reynolds / Sue August6-0, 6-3
2022-01-24vs Yachty By Nature - A. RockwoodWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Cowley / Tobey Hartigan vs Amanda Rockwood / Carrie Ferderigos6-4, 6-1
2022-01-10vs HCC Overserved - Borel-SaladinWon 20
W#1 DoublesTobey Hartigan / Amy Quinn vs Sejal Alvarez / Jenni Carroll4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarole Jahns / Amy Parmer vs Nicole Borel-Saladin / Laura Luksik6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Katherine Cowley
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
Vera Dikmen
published
3.18
3.09
Carole Jahns
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.97
Tobey Hartigan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.89
Lara Saade
published
2.87
Lisa Nero
published
Amy Rosewater
published 3
2.65
Amy Parmer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tobey Hartigan + Katherine Cowley3846% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katherine Cowley
83W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.48
Vera Dikmen
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3
Elizabeth Provenzano
62W–35L career · no lines in 2022
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Carole Jahns
68W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Tobey Hartigan
105W–94L career · 7 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
Lara Saade
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
Lisa Nero
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Amy Rosewater
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Amy Parmer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.