Teams

Gourdine - Make Tennis Great Again

2025 Howard Adult 18 & Over · Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.22 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-06-10vs OaksmithLost 13
W#1 DoublesAva Singleton / Tisha Tyson vs Brenda Crowe / Margaret Asher7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRachele Stines / Kimberly Scott vs Elisa Oaksmith / Lorinda Rawlings2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCasey Royster vs Cheryl Embree5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDanielle Gourdine / Angela Curry vs Sandy Segrist / Monica Targonski4-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs MacDonald - MacAttack 3.5 18+Split 11
L#2 DoublesCarey Greenauer / Maria Nieve vs Sarah Speirs / Debra MacDonald0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAva Singleton / Tisha Tyson vs Brittany Muth / Sherri Capurso6-3, 6-4
2025-05-28vs Mccullough - Bounce-tasticLost 02
L#1 DoublesAva Singleton / Tisha Tyson vs Lena Brandenburg / Colleen Knapp6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCasey Royster vs Elvira McCullough0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJessica Dixon Laukzemis / Casey Royster vs Shyrelle Eubanks / Yngrid Sierra6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesRachele Stines vs Kelly Kennedy6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Curry / Maria Nieve vs Ebla Aliibrahim / Jeanny Pope7-6, 6-5
L#1 SinglesCasey Royster vs Thu Pham4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElsie Stines / Rachele Stines vs Alicia Mabry / Debbie Tow6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSuzanne McHugh / Maria Nieve vs Angela Gardner / Lee WILLIAMS6-3, 6-3
2025-05-06vs Ruggiero - Baby's Got BackhandsWon 20
W#2 SinglesCasey Royster vs Lisa Greenlee6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRachele Stines / Maria Nieve vs Holly M Beck / Diane Ruggiero6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-01vs Phan - Spin-derellasLost 02
L#1 DoublesAva Singleton / Tisha Tyson vs Tricia Muneses / Andrea Burkert2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarey Greenauer / Casey Royster vs Rebecca Stewart / Susie Cheung2-6, 1-6
2025-04-28vs Battista - Net Setters 18Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAva Singleton / Tisha Tyson vs Diane Carson / Gay Peterson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGrace Gourdine / Rachele Stines vs Kathy Tuckey / Eunice Winfree4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarey Greenauer / Angela Curry vs Tamar Henkin / Leigh Leslie4-6, 5-5
W#1 DoublesAva Singleton / Tisha Tyson vs Patricia Jenkins / Jeanne Celtnieks4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDanyelle Taylor / Angela Curry vs Karen Keane / Katie Wolven1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRachele Stines vs Julia Heeter3-6, 3-6
2025-04-15vs Chung - The Rack-ettesLost 13
L#1 DoublesDanyelle Taylor / Suzanne McHugh vs GENA CHUNG / Lisa Walsh1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeanna Gourdine / Maria Nieve vs Sung Cho / Claire Kim4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRachele Stines vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Curry / Casey Royster vs Linda Tsai / Jessica Thompson4-6, 2-6
2025-04-09vs Davidson - Sets In The CityLost 03
L#1 DoublesAva Singleton / Tisha Tyson vs Meaghan Williams / Karen Yannone7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Nieve / Suzanne McHugh vs Chrissy Adair / Nicole Brizan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRachele Stines / Danyelle Taylor vs Loan Nguyen / Sorina Eftim3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Tisha Tyson
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.34
Suzanne McHugh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Danielle Gourdine
published 3.5
3.32
Casey Royster
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.94
Rachele Stines
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.83
Ava Singleton
published 3
2.77
Carey Greenauer
published 3
2.72
Angela Curry
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.68
Maria Nieve
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
Elsie Stines
published
Kimberly Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Royster + Rachele Stines4253% gamesnot enough data
Casey Royster + Tisha Tyson404 matchesnot enough data
Elsie Stines + Kimberly Scott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tisha Tyson
155W–57L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Suzanne McHugh
42W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Danielle Gourdine
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Casey Royster
192W–200L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3
Rachele Stines
165W–138L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Ava Singleton
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Carey Greenauer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Angela Curry
87W–140L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Maria Nieve
68W–134L career · 14 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Elsie Stines
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Dixon Laukzemis
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Scott
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.