Teams

TAG

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

13 players · average NTRP 2.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs MLF ORANGELost 13
L#1 DoublesThora Pabst / Shirley Moore vs Libby Nikkel / Kathy Carlson2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesShelly Donahue vs Tiffany Burns1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGail Sullivan / Deirdre White vs Wendy Sprague / Lori Rasmussen1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Herold / Melissa Dalton vs Shannon Bigner / Jamie Heckman3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-07-11vs FCCC PURPLESplit 22
L#1 DoublesThora Pabst / Amy Herold vs Jane Schmelzle / Shanti Green3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJennifer Borg vs Christina Baker6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGail Sullivan / Carolyn Gattis vs Jackie Spradley / Sherry McCoy3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDeirdre White / Mary Bengford vs Victoria Archer / Teresa Nugent6-2, 6-3
2022-07-06vs LTLost 03
L#1 DoublesShirley Moore / Thora Pabst vs Deborah Lockwood / Carri Miller4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Herold / Dawn Setser vs Janet Krech / Teri Ouar3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Dalton / Cheryl Clausen vs Bernita Sterling / Cindy Eisenberg0-6, 3-6
2022-06-27vs FCCC PINKSplit 22
L#1 DoublesShirley Moore / Deirdre White vs Terese Shanley / Molly Skold4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDawn Setser vs Jane Roberti6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSandy Chenore / Melissa Dalton vs Teresa Girardi / Amy Artzer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesThora Pabst / Gail Sullivan vs Nicole Holmes / Denise Benz6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-13vs MLF YELLOWLost 04
L#1 DoublesShirley Moore / Shelly Donahue vs Erin Dirvonas / Kristen Frisch0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Borg vs Katheryn Hill3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesThora Pabst / Carolyn Gattis vs Lisa Martin / Natalie Patterson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Clausen / Gail Sullivan vs Diane Erickson / Maka Hammock0-6, 0-6
2022-06-06vs HMTCLost 13
W#1 DoublesDeirdre White / Thora Pabst vs Kimberley Hattem / Tracy Sanders6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesDawn Setser vs Alli Lackey3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Clausen / Amy Herold vs Lori Masi / Jennifer Grim3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Chenore / Melissa Dalton vs Susan Seiler / Ingrid Parsons4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Shirley Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Amy Herold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Dawn Setser
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Sandy Chenore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Carolyn Gattis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Thora Pabst
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.39
Gail Sullivan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Deirdre White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.10
Cheryl Clausen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jennifer Borg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Mary Bengford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Dalton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Shelly Donahue
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gail Sullivan + Shelly Donahue2737% games+7.5% vs expected
Melissa Dalton + Amy Herold4445% games+1.6% vs expected
Deirdre White + Thora Pabst3448% games+1.4% vs expected
Sandy Chenore + Amy Herold8744% games−2.4% vs expected
Melissa Dalton + Sandy Chenore0735% games−3.3% vs expected
Sandy Chenore + Deirdre White3540% games−5.1% vs expected
Thora Pabst + Amy Herold1932% games−9.8% vs expected
Gail Sullivan + Cheryl Clausen0625% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shirley Moore
53W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Amy Herold
19W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Dawn Setser
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65
Sandy Chenore
17W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Carolyn Gattis
5W–25L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Thora Pabst
30W–85L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.45
3
Gail Sullivan
3W–46L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.39
2.5
Deirdre White
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Cheryl Clausen
0W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jennifer Borg
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Bengford
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Dalton
7W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shelly Donahue
11W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.