Teams

A.Pershke

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-09vs K.SouthernWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Best / Catie Cunningham vs Nora Stacey / Cosette Philpot3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-05-02vs M.Heath/HowardLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarlet Edwards / Catie Cunningham vs Lindsey Howard / Beth Rives0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Rostick / Mary Elizabeth Phillips vs Lindsey Taylor / Leah Brinkley4-6, 3-6
2023-04-25vs J.LiddleLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Gill / Katherine Rostick vs Julie Karg / Lynelle Clark2-6, 2-6
2023-04-21vs G.Scoggin 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatherine Rostick / Mary Elizabeth Phillips vs Alisa Smith / Ashley Yelverton6-3, 6-3
2023-04-11vs G.Scoggin 40+Split 11
L#1 DoublesAnn Pershke / Claudia Cadet vs Alisa Smith / Eden Jenkins1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKatherine Rostick / Ellen Nespeca vs Janice Garside / Ashley Robertson6-3, 6-4
2023-03-28vs K.SouthernLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarlet Edwards / Katherine Rostick vs Nora Stacey / Debra Hauge4-6, 3-6
2023-03-21vs M.Heath/HowardWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatie Cunningham / Melanie Gill vs Lindsey Taylor / Lindsey Howard6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-14vs J.LiddleLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnn Pershke / Katherine Rostick vs Julie Liddle / Hope Graney2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Cadet / Misty Howell vs Linda Blevins / Lisa Bakowski0-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Catie Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.82
Emily Best
published 3
2.78
Katherine Rostick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Ann Pershke
published 3
2.66
Claudia Cadet
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Marlet Edwards
published
2.60
Melanie Gill
published
2.53
Kathleen Malik
published
2.52
Josie Tattersall
published
2.37
Misty Howell
published
2.08
Ellen Nespeca
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Cadet + Catie Cunningham4168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Emily Best
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Katherine Rostick
55W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ann Pershke
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Claudia Cadet
38W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
Marlet Edwards
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
Melanie Gill
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
Kathleen Malik
0W–11L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
Josie Tattersall
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Misty Howell
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Ellen Nespeca
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Mary Elizabeth Phillips
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.