Teams

SFV-String Em Along

SFV-SoCal Doubles-18 & Over · SFV - Women 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-11vs SFV-Shot GirlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesDelia Holguin / Monica Mitchell vs Joann Miles / Kathy Devore2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAni Aratounians / Mardie Villadiego vs Elizabeth Hackelton / Patricia Dunn3-6, 2-6
2021-12-04vs SFV-Toluca Lake SwansLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarrie Gasper / Diane Quan vs Nickie Huai / Houry Nadjarian3-6, 4-6
2021-11-21vs SFV-Calabasas AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Delia Holguin vs Miri Mizrahi / Corrine Weiner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-10-31vs SFV-TeamCorbinLost 02
L#2 DoublesRosalyn Daniels / Monica Mitchell vs Jill Koenig / Christy Feinfield5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKaren Gouveia / Carrie Gasper vs Alona Kavinoky / Kathrina Cruz3-6, 4-6
2021-10-03vs SFV-Warner StrikersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarrie Gasper / Rosalyn Daniels vs Maureen Shideh / Kim Olds1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLori Pedraza / Celia Dominguez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-09-19vs SFV-LLW - Team Ade - Ade QuingcoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKristy Swailes / Ani Aratounians vs Erica Perkins / Elena Saydah2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMonica Mitchell / Diane Quan vs Rebecca Escandon / Ade Quingco7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-09-11vs SFV-2 Sets To LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesAni Aratounians / Diane Quan vs Ghazala Trotter / SANDI WISE1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Monica Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Celia Dominguez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Delia Holguin
published 4
3.67
Rosalyn Daniels
published
3.53
Mardie Villadiego
published
3.35
Ani Aratounians
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.26
Diane Quan
published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Gasper
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Kristy Swailes
published
Lori Pedraza
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monica Mitchell
77W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Celia Dominguez
58W–99L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Delia Holguin
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rosalyn Daniels
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Mardie Villadiego
9W–11L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Ani Aratounians
73W–121L career · 3 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Diane Quan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 11 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kristy Swailes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori Pedraza
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.