Teams

A6 Salisbury Moorhead 2

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-06-05vs A3 Woodlake McCoyLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Burns / Cathy Keith vs Blanka White / Wendy Learn2-6, 2-6
2021-05-22vs A1 ACAC TandettLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Burns / Kimberly Means vs Jen Waller / Julia Preusser3-6, 3-6
2021-04-10vs A7 Magnolia Green LangWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Burns / Kendra Wiggins vs Katie McKenney / Beata Ksionski6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Erin Garrett
published 3.5
2.86
Kimberly Means
published
Debby Gies
published 3
2.72
Cathy Keith
published 3
Jennifer Burns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kendra Wiggins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Garrett
16W–17L career · no lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kimberly Means
9W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Debby Gies
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Wauford
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Cathy Keith
8W–24L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
2.5
Jennifer Burns
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kendra Wiggins
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.