Teams

LVTA BLACK

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-04vs TAG BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Jackson / Shawn Farnell vs Michael Wagner / Matthew Penhale6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesHarim Gonzalez vs John McNally2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Smith / Nikolas Bote vs Dale Oberlag / Christian Muna6-4, 6-1
2025-08-21vs CSU GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesRyan Selby / Shawn Farnell vs Scott Bolton / Jeff Keepman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesColby Mueller vs Jayden Atkin4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHarim Gonzalez / Craig Smith vs Andrew Meister / Chad Schneider4-6, 0-6
2025-08-07vs CSU WHITEWon 20
W#1 DoublesRyan Selby / Nikolas Bote vs Michael Boyle / Jacob Krause6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesColby Mueller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-31vs TAG BLUESplit 11
L#1 SinglesRyan Selby vs John McNally3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNikolas Bote / Taylor Nguyen vs Seth Krammer / Casey Krammer6-2, 7-5
2025-07-24vs CSU GOLDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Selby / Shawn Farnell vs Ian Powers / Dylan Hatanelas6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHarim Gonzalez vs Ian Hay-Arthur1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Nikolas Bote
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Shawn Farnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Colby Mueller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Ryan Selby
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Harim Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Bill Bruschke
published 4.5
4.04
Taylor Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Selby + Shawn Farnell9160% games+7.5% vs expected
Harim Gonzalez + Colby Mueller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nikolas Bote
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Shawn Farnell
58W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Colby Mueller
62W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Ryan Selby
43W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Harim Gonzalez
33W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Bill Bruschke
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
Taylor Nguyen
9W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.