Teams

4S:Ball Busters:Herrington

2026 SCT Tri-Level WOMEN · Women 3.0 Tri-Level

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · Women 3.0 Tri-Level
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MRC:Tri 3.0:Vitti000000
2TCT:Truth or Dare Doubles:Esposito000000
34S:Tri Harder:Tuohy000000
4TRC:Tri 3.0:Gonzalez000000
5TCT:Four the Win:Nelson000000
6CP:Tri-Umph:Rothe000000
74S:Ball Busters:Herrington000000
8TCT:Tri 3.0:Adams000000
9GRC:Tri 3.0:Wells000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Dana Jensen
published 3
2.70
Mary Herrington
published
2.68
Stacy French
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Jensen
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Mary Herrington
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Christine Dimaano
46W–56L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Stacy French
21W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.