Teams

TPC Sugarloaf (Jose Cangiano)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 3.0 Men (D.C.)

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-07-12vs Fields Club (Kevin Brown)*Lost 04
L#1 DoublesMichael Stockton / Salim Merchant vs Carson White / Greg White6-1
L#1 SinglesTod Nelson vs Seth Kindig3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVikas Malhotra / Armando Perez vs Melvin Bullock / Tim Davies5-2
L#3 DoublesJose Cangiano / Maximino Gonzalez vs Martin Levinson / Michael Gricus2-3
2026-06-28vs Montclair (Asifuddin Khadari)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Stockton / Salim Merchant vs Mohammed Idris / Seenuvasan Kalasapakkam Sivagnanam6-4, 2-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTod Nelson vs MJ Mohammed4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVikas Malhotra / Armando Perez vs Matthew Gonzalez / Shaan Noorani5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men (D.C.) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Michael Stockton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Tod Nelson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.07
Chad Carpenter
published 3.5
3.06
Vikas Malhotra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Armando Perez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ashwin Shah
published 3
2.66
Shawn Holtzclaw
published
Jaimini Dave
published
Jose Cangiano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Martin Bush
published
Pat Barron
published
Roberto Gutierrez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Armando Perez + Shawn Holtzclaw224 matchesnot enough data
Tod Nelson + Jaimini Dave314 matchesnot enough data
Armando Perez + Vikas Malhotra123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Stockton
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Tod Nelson
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Chad Carpenter
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Vikas Malhotra
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Armando Perez
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ashwin Shah
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Holtzclaw
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.66
Jaimini Dave
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jose Cangiano
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Martin Bush
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pat Barron
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Roberto Gutierrez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.