Teams

SGV LLW Dare Doubles-Wang-WN/SU

2024 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.19 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-01vs SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl/SA1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKarla Garcia / Adrienne Beauvois vs Kristina Chen / Loretta Peng1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Shin / Heidi Schuler vs Amanda Richardson / Anhtu Pham6-3, 6-1
2024-10-27vs SGV Live Oaks-Jones-LOTA/SU1:30Won 10
W#2 DoublesWoodie Tran / Heidi Schuler vs Carissa Park / Jennifer Portillo4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Schuler / Woodie Tran vs Laura del Beccaro / Jami Johnson6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJane Wang / Hatty Yip vs Susan Miller / Penapa Frick2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCara Hofstad / Adrienne Beauvois vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-28vs SGV Mo Better Dubs-DeRosa-WN/SA8Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Avila / Cara Hofstad vs Shirley Fong / Julie Kanjanapangka3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.42
Cindy Shin
published 4.5
Cheryl Park
published 4.5
4.15
Jennifer Avila
published
4.15
Heidi Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.13
Hatty Yip
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.07
Jasmine Dai
published
3.81
Davina Hsu
published 4
3.80
Karla Garcia
published
3.79
Adrienne Beauvois
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Cara Hofstad
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.63
Yolanda Barocio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrienne Beauvois + Cara Hofstad13856% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
4.46
4.5
Cindy Shin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
4.42
4.5
Cheryl Park
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Avila
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Heidi Schuler
117W–78L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
4.15
4
Hatty Yip
99W–33L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%16%84%
4.13
Jasmine Dai
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Davina Hsu
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Karla Garcia
2W–18L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.80
4
Adrienne Beauvois
152W–120L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Cara Hofstad
218W–155L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Yolanda Barocio
136W–211L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.