Teams

Odell 2.5

Spring Fun · 18 & Over 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-25vs Kaminski 2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesClaire Cunningham / Pamela Harvey vs Pamela Chestnut / Nakia Mccallum6-0, 6-1
2026-06-22vs Woodside 2.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesChante Argenti / Mary Guynn vs Miranda Wood / Sarah Rustin2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Harvey / Emma Young vs Claire Williams / Anna Macdonald6-1, 7-6
2026-06-04vs Woodside 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Guynn / Pamela Harvey vs Anna Macdonald / Claire Williams6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmma Young vs Miranda Wood6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-05-21vs Kaminski 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesClaire Cunningham / Emma Young vs Sarah Thompson / Pamela Chestnut6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChante Argenti / Mary Guynn vs Nakia Mccallum / Amanda Kaminski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Claire Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Emma Young
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Pamela Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Chante Argenti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.04
Mary Guynn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christian Rogerson
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Claire Cunningham
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
Emma Young
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Pamela Harvey
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Chante Argenti
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Guynn
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.