Teams

Ladies with game!

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-14vs The Young and the Rest of UsLost 05
L#1 DoublesBette Belanger / Jennifer Duclos vs Donna Newman / Cindy Nunn2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAracelis Bell vs Saharra McKee3-6
L#2 DoublesJanis Skliar / Susan Brunner vs Angelina Salvato / Emily Elison4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDana Griffin vs Kerry Youngren1-6, 0-5
L#3 DoublesSong Bliss / Kathy McArthur vs Daniella DeLozier / Jessie Lief3-6, 1-6
2022-05-14vs The Young and the Rest of UsLost 04
L#1 DoublesKathy McArthur / Susan Brunner vs Cindy Nunn / Emily Elison1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJanis Skliar vs Saharra McKee1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSong Bliss / Bette Belanger vs Nura Abdulhalim / Donna Newman0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Duclos / Dana Griffin vs Jessie Lief / Daniella DeLozier2-6, 4-6
2022-05-14vs The Young and the Rest of UsLost 13
L#1 DoublesBette Belanger / Jennifer Duclos vs Emily Elison / Kerry Youngren0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDana Griffin vs Angelina Salvato7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanis Skliar / Kathy McArthur vs Saharra McKee / Nura Abdulhalim1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSong Bliss / Susan Brunner vs Jessie Lief / Daniella DeLozier0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Young and the Rest of Us30132459
2Ladies with game!0311428176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jennifer Duclos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Dana Griffin
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Susan Brunner
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Kathy McArthur
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Song Bliss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Aracelis Bell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 0
Janis Skliar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Vicki Moe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Brunner + Kathy McArthur2355% games+7.6% vs expected
Dana Griffin + Jennifer Duclos7651% games−4.3% vs expected
Kathy McArthur + Song Bliss0934% games−12.9% vs expected
Susan Brunner + Song Bliss213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Duclos
76W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dana Griffin
111W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Susan Brunner
112W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Kathy McArthur
64W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Song Bliss
63W–86L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
0
Aracelis Bell
21W–28L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Janis Skliar
4W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Vicki Moe
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.