Teams

Lunsford/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Women 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Kyle Denney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Lauren Heard
published
3.04
Kayleigh Mitchell
published
3.02
Ashley Lunsford
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.94
Lauren Cunningham
published
2.90
Breeana Crouch
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.83
Natalie Souder
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
2.77
Jean Phebus
published
2.73
Natalie McLean
published
2.61
Katie Gronostaj
published
2.50
Lyndsay Gronostaj
published
2.50
Amy Smythe
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Lunsford + Kayleigh Mitchell3249% games+3.6% vs expected
Lyndsay Gronostaj + Ashley Lunsford4846% games+3.0% vs expected
Kyle Denney + Natalie Souder2537% games+0.3% vs expected
Natalie McLean + Kayleigh Mitchell404 matchesnot enough data
Jean Phebus + Lauren Heard314 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Denney + Lauren Heard404 matchesnot enough data
Breeana Crouch + Natalie Souder314 matchesnot enough data
Lyndsay Gronostaj + Natalie Souder134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Denney
31W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.16
Lauren Heard
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.08
Kayleigh Mitchell
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Ashley Lunsford
42W–41L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Lauren Cunningham
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Breeana Crouch
16W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Natalie Souder
25W–36L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Jean Phebus
28W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Natalie McLean
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Katie Gronostaj
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Lyndsay Gronostaj
33W–47L career · no lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Amy Smythe
20W–24L career · no lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.