Teams

CP RED

2022 CTA ADULT 18-39 - DEN · MEN 4.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-19vs BRMST REDWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesJeremy Behm-Meyer / Forrest Kennel vs Stephen Pola / Christopher Midanier7-5, 6-3
2022-07-12vs CP NAVYWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesBrian Williams / Jamal Heydari vs Paul Suyumov / Tai Le7-5, 6-3
W#2 Male SinglesSAMUEL TORREZ vs Matthew Hooper7-5, 6-1
2022-07-05Lost 01
L#1 Male SinglesJamal Heydari vs Adam Knox7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-28vs BTA BLUELost 02
L#1 Male DoublesJeremy Behm-Meyer / Jamal Heydari vs Matt Miller / Craig Hoeltgen4-6, 4-6
L#2 Male SinglesSAMUEL TORREZ vs Connor Ohlsen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-14vs BRMST REDWon 20
W#1 Male DoublesKenny Leavitt / Jamal Heydari vs Christopher Midanier / Spencer Bouck6-3, 6-1
W#1 Male SinglesSAMUEL TORREZ vs James Colegrove6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 4.5 - ADULT 18-39 - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BTA BLUE601627148
2CP RED4212612136
3CP GREEN3371125183
4CP NAVY2461225176
5BRMST RED0631532210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.38 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.63
Kenny Leavitt
published
4.33
Jeremy Behm-Meyer
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Jamal Heydari
usually #1 Male Doubles 75%, also #1 Male Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Nick Salazar
published
4.30
SAMUEL TORREZ
usually #2 Male Singles 67%, also #1 Male Singles 33% · published 4.5
Forrest Kennel
published
Robbie Pike
published
Rodrigo Segura
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Behm-Meyer + Nick Salazar7068% games+4.2% vs expected
Jeremy Behm-Meyer + Jamal Heydari271258% games+2.5% vs expected
Jamal Heydari + SAMUEL TORREZ303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenny Leavitt
29W–23L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.63
4.5
Jeremy Behm-Meyer
81W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
4.33
4.5
Jamal Heydari
89W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Nick Salazar
50W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
SAMUEL TORREZ
55W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Forrest Kennel
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robbie Pike
15W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rodrigo Segura
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.