Teams

NJ RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-07vs RHCC WHITEWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlene Bailey / Crystal Campbell Messer vs Anne Steputis / Colleen McClary7-6, 6-1
2023-08-31vs HIW REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarcie Coy / Charlene Bailey vs Anne Barwell / Summer Kusel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-24vs MC ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlene Bailey / Crystal Campbell Messer vs Shelley Flood / Hannah Tomlinson6-3, 6-1
2023-08-17vs NJ PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesCrystal Campbell Messer / Darcie Coy vs Kimberly Bonczynski / Angela Harper6-1, 6-2
2023-08-03vs BP GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharlene Bailey / Darcie Coy vs Miranda Jackson / Leslie Lane6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-27vs BVP GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharlene Bailey / Lisa Mountain vs Kelsey Pobanz / Natalie Bailey6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Kristin Williams
published
3.90
Crystal Campbell Messer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Charlene Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Darcie Coy
published 4
3.60
Morgan Cox
published
3.53
Alexandra Fortna
published 3.5
3.50
Lisa Mountain
published
3.37
Nikole Randolph
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlene Bailey + Sandra Lucero Jacquez033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Williams
14W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Crystal Campbell Messer
132W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Charlene Bailey
129W–101L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Darcie Coy
85W–59L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.84
Morgan Cox
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Alexandra Fortna
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.53
Lisa Mountain
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Sandra Lucero Jacquez
27W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Nikole Randolph
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.