Teams

Kiwanis - Hughes

2025 Brevard Combo 18 & Over - Women's Summer · 5.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-24vs Kiwi - BurkeWon 10
W#1 DoublesRene Hurst-Wall / Frances Miles vs Carla Norton / Edna Chism6-0, 6-1
2025-07-17vs RCCB - NicholsLost 12
W#1 DoublesRene Hurst-Wall / Frances Miles vs Tricia Patterson / Cheryl Toth6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarsha Napier / Marianne Pluchino vs Frances Wagner / Madonna Bailey6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Ford / Clara Parsons vs Lindsay Nichols / Amanda Mccaughin3-6, 0-6
2025-07-11vs Kiwi - BurkeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKerry Sawyer / Frances Miles vs Donna Ford / Lisa Sexton6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJean Romanelli / MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES vs Carla Norton / Katie Recker6-7, 2-6
2025-07-03vs Viera Regional Park - OsbornLost 03
L#1 DoublesRene Hurst-Wall / Kelli Cordis vs Carol Roesch / Brenda Tarquinio2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJean Romanelli / Frances Miles vs Eileen Stapleton / Lael Woods1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Ford / Clara Parsons vs Linda Hall / Jenifer Raymond1-6, 5-7
2025-06-26vs RCCB - NicholsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Samples / Frances Miles vs Lindsay Nichols / Cheryl Toth1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKerry Sawyer / MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES vs Rebecca Hollingsworth / Shelley Vandermeulen6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Ford / Marianne Pluchino vs Tricia Patterson / Amanda Mccaughin6-1, 6-0
2025-06-19vs Kiwi - BurkeWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelli Cordis / Rene Hurst-Wall vs Kathy Chell / Stacy Konrad6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMARIE MEASEL-HUGHES / Jean Romanelli vs Marlene Johns / Summer Moses6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathryn Parks / Clara Parsons vs Constance Smith / Lisa Sexton1-6, 1-6
2025-06-12vs Viera Regional Park - OsbornLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Samples / Marianne Pluchino vs Jenifer Raymond / Jessica Martinez1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFrances Miles / Susan Ford vs Kristi Swor / Lael Woods7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarsha Napier / Garrett Kuge vs Cheryl Madlener / Donna Salazar6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-05vs RCCB - NicholsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelli Cordis / Kerry Sawyer vs Frances Wagner / Madonna Bailey6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLesa Haas / Marianne Pluchino vs Tricia Patterson / Shelley Vandermeulen7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMary Samples / Garrett Kuge vs Lindsay Nichols / Cheryl Toth5-7, 5-7
2025-05-15vs Viera Regional Park - OsbornLost 03
L#1 DoublesJean Romanelli / Frances Miles vs Jessica Martinez / Cheryl Madlener5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelli Cordis / Lesa Haas vs Cyndi Mcdougall / Kristi Swor4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMARIE MEASEL-HUGHES / Marsha Napier vs Linda Hall / Brenda Tarquinio3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Kerry Sawyer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Rene Hurst-Wall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Mary Samples
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Clara Parsons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Frances Miles
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Garrett Kuge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jean Romanelli
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Joanne Ringrose
published
Kathryn Parks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kelli Cordis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lesa Haas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Marianne Pluchino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marsha Napier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rene Hurst-Wall + Frances Miles5163% gamesnot enough data
Kelli Cordis + Lesa Haas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerry Sawyer
39W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.20
Rene Hurst-Wall
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
Mary Samples
0W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
2.5
Clara Parsons
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Frances Miles
6W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Garrett Kuge
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jean Romanelli
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joanne Ringrose
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathryn Parks
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelli Cordis
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lesa Haas
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
MARIE MEASEL-HUGHES
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marianne Pluchino
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marsha Napier
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.