Teams

BERKELEY TC CW6.5A

2024 COMBO · Women 6.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Linh Becker
published
3.56
Shannon Jackson
published
3.39
Shannon Smuts
published
3.31
Midori Antebi
published
3.30
Marissa Nichols
published
3.28
Tammy Nikoltcheva
published
3.17
Yulia Costello
published
3.17
Kendall Riding
published
3.13
Nadine Joseph
published
3.12
Molly Fraker
published
3.09
Daryl Austern
published 3.5
2.97
Hiromi Takekuma
published
2.90
Gabriela Aranda
published
2.87
Rebecca Abrams
published
2.83
Irina Wolf Carriere
published
2.81
Michelle Marshank
published
2.75
Juliet Lamont
published
2.62
Joanna Katz
published
2.57
2.40
Adrian Hill
published 2.5
Melissa Nelken
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Smuts + Yulia Costello1444% gamesnot enough data
Gabriela Aranda + Michelle Marshank224 matchesnot enough data
Marissa Nichols + Shannon Jackson404 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Abrams + Molly Fraker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linh Becker
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
Shannon Jackson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.56
Shannon Smuts
10W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Midori Antebi
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.31
Marissa Nichols
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Tammy Nikoltcheva
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Yulia Costello
11W–29L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Kendall Riding
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Nadine Joseph
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Molly Fraker
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Daryl Austern
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Hiromi Takekuma
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Gabriela Aranda
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Rebecca Abrams
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
Irina Wolf Carriere
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
2.83
Michelle Marshank
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Juliet Lamont
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
Joanna Katz
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Bernadette Joseph
1W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
2.5
Adrian Hill
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%77%23%
2.40
Melissa Nelken
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.