Teams

HOCO-WILSON

2024 · 2025 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

23 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Brantley Stone
published 4
3.92
Trenton Shepherd
published
3.88
John Akridge
published
3.85
Luke Kinser
published
3.73
Noah Goff
published
3.68
Hunter Wilson
published
3.65
Daniel English
published 4
3.56
Robert Cordova
published
3.56
Stacy Stephens
published
3.44
Jonathan Shepherd
published
3.40
Bill Brett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Rodney Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Rodney Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Jeff Dehem
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Philip Taylor
published
3.27
Greg Smolianinov
published
3.20
Chris West
published 3.5
3.20
Chris West
published 3.5
3.20
Christopher Wright
published 3.5
3.19
Rudy Lamothe
published
3.14
Scott Hastings
published
Jeffrey Moody
published
Rob Crain
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Akridge + Luke Kinser7167% games+9.3% vs expected
Jonathan Shepherd + Bill Brett3258% games+7.7% vs expected
Rodney Wilson + Hunter Wilson3243% gamesnot enough data
Rudy Lamothe + Jeff Dehem3256% gamesnot enough data
Rodney Wilson + Trenton Shepherd224 matchesnot enough data
Trenton Shepherd + Hunter Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Trenton Shepherd + Luke Kinser404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brantley Stone
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.96
Trenton Shepherd
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.92
John Akridge
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Luke Kinser
24W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Noah Goff
20W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Hunter Wilson
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
4
Daniel English
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Robert Cordova
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Stacy Stephens
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Jonathan Shepherd
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Bill Brett
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Rodney Wilson
29W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Rodney Wilson
29W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jeff Dehem
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Philip Taylor
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Greg Smolianinov
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Chris West
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Chris West
0W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Christopher Wright
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Rudy Lamothe
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Scott Hastings
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jeffrey Moody
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Crain
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.