Teams

CV-Giacomini

2024 CV Masters' 70s League · CV-Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-02-29vs CV-RingerLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarjo Hull / Ilse Hine vs Donna Ringer / Gay Hart0-6, 4-6
L#5 DoublesCarel James / Kathy McArthur vs Reney Schild / Fay Zuccato6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2024-02-27vs CV-WillseySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarjo Hull / Eileen Clark vs Carmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#5 DoublesKathy McArthur / Carel James vs Karen Felton / Petra Gellner2-6, 4-6
2024-02-22vs CV-WillseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarjo Hull / Sharon Williams vs Leslie Zauher / Bonnie Paasche1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-15vs CV-ParkersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarjo Hull / Ilse Hine vs Sally Mangina / Wendy Hawley3-6, 1-6
L#5 DoublesCarel James / Kathy McArthur vs Gina Orban / Roberta Dierks2-6, 2-6
2024-01-25Won 10
W#5 DoublesCarel James / Kathy McArthur vs Jean Kechely / Janet Nelson6-1, 6-2
2024-01-18vs CV-RingerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarjo Hull / Eileen Clark vs Gay Hart / Martha Church3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#5 DoublesCarel James / Kathy McArthur vs Karen Meyer / Fay Zuccato4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Marjo Hull
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Eileen Clark
published 3.5
Ilse Hine
published 3.5
2.76
Kathy McArthur
usually #5 Doubles 100% · published 3
Diane Fass
published 3
2.70
Ellen Boyer
published 3
2.65
Carel James
published 3
Candy Doud
published 0
Janet Daniel
published
Jenny Carson
published
Leda Potente
published
Susan Markowitz
published
Susan Vance
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jenny Carson + Eileen Clark404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marjo Hull
129W–94L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
3.5
Eileen Clark
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Ilse Hine
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Kathy McArthur
64W–98L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Diane Fass
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ellen Boyer
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Carel James
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
0
Candy Doud
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janet Daniel
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jenny Carson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leda Potente
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Markowitz
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Vance
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.